-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
Project Meeting 2021.02.16
Ben Stabler edited this page Feb 18, 2021
·
2 revisions
- Estimation integration
- Newman working through the additional notebooks and finding some little improvements here and there to make
- We can make the specs more consistent across submodels, which would make the estimation integration more generic too
- We're working through it and keeping track of ideas. Some ideas we can do and others may need to come later.
- Let's make things as consistent as we can given the task resources
- Starting to work on test system improvements
- Cleaned up and organized PSRC example for inclusion in expanded test system
- Added ability to subset example by zones (for example just Seattle) so test case is manageable
- Improving facility for PSRC (or others) to update their test example via a PR when desired
- We're planning to add SEMCOG and ARC too in a similar fashion
- Share PSRC revisions with Stefan
- When are we going to draft a plan for the improved test system for the PMC to react to?
- We'll get started on the plan and have something to discuss next week
- This will be a good vehicle to assist the conversation and to articulate ideas around how "correct and complete" contributions need to be for acceptance
- We're evolving toward a features/examples matrix setup (as opposed to one example or "spines")
- Need to finish merge of recent work to develop
- Jeff tidying up all merges into develop for me to review
- This includes estimation, performance, and some small develop improvements
- PSRC taz/maz sampling improvements
- Running all the way through for 100k HHs
- Runs a lot faster - 1278min to 172min single process
- Also ran the memmapped skims instead of all skims in memory approach and ran in 184 min and used 29 GB RAM instead of 172 min and 60 GB RAM
- Can be turned on/off and works for 1, 2, and 3 zone models
- @Stefan to try and could be good for AWS runs on machines with less RAM
- SANDAG ran into memory issues with accessibility calculator
- Machine had 320 GB RAM but Accessibility submodel is not chunked so requires a lot RAM to do the MAZ to MAZ accessibilities
- We implemented support for 3 zone models using the little toy example and the Marin tour mode choice model so accessibility worked for the little example but wasn't part of the plan for the work tour mode model
- PSRC got around this issue by using a bigger AWS machine
- We'll fix it for the cross border model, it shouldn't take more than a day-ish
- Representative logsums is the next feature
- Continued improvement of our coordination across efforts
- We need to elevate the task 6 memo since there's an urgency for improved coordination around contribution acceptance requirements
- How much validation/correctness of model results detail do we need to accept a contribution?
- A contribution is code, examples, and documentation + verification
- Let's plan to discuss some more next week