Skip to content

Poorter1999

Daniel Falster edited this page Nov 25, 2014 · 1 revision

Report for study: Poorter1999

Contact Information

Data contributor: Lourens Poorter

Email: [email protected]

Address:

  • Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands

Data source

Citation: Poorter L (1999). 'Growth responses of 15 rain-forest tree species to a light gradient: the relative importance of morphological and physiological traits.' Functional Ecology, 13, pp. 396-410.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00332.x

Abstract: 1. Growth of seedlings of 15 rain-forest tree species was compared under controlled conditions, at six different light levels (3, 6, 12, 25, 50 and 100% daylight). 2. Most plant variables showed strong ontogenetic changes; they were highly dependent on the biomass of the plant. 3. Growth rate was highest at intermediate fight levels (25-50%) above which it declined. Most plant variables showed a curvilinear response to irradiance, with the largest changes at the lowest Light levels. 4. There was a consistent ranking in growth between species; species that were fast growing in a low-light environment were also fast growing in a high-light environment. 5. At low light, interspecific variation in relative growth rate was determined mainly by differences in a morphological trait, the leaf area ratio (LAR), whereas at high light it was determined mainly by differences in a physiological trait, the net assimilation rate (NAR). 6. NAR became a stronger determinant of growth than LAR in more than 10-15% daylight. As light availability in the forest is generally much lower than this threshold level, it follows that interspecific variation in growth in a forest environment is mainly owing to variation in morphology.

Overview of data provided

The dataset includes records for 1612 individuals from 15 species belonging to 9 family(ies), presenting 2 functional type(s), growing in 1 condition(s) within 1 major type(s) of habitat, with data included for the following variables:

Variable Label Units N Min Median Max
latitude Latitude deg 1612 -11 -11 -11
longitude Longitude deg 1612 -66 -66 -66
a.lf Leaf area m2 1609 0.0001 0.02 0.49
a.stba Stem area at base m2 1023 0.00000095 0.000013 0.00013
a.cp Crown area m2 526 0.0002 0.066 0.42
h.t Height m 1611 0.03 0.23 1.1
h.c Height to crown base m 463 0 0.1 0.42
d.ba Basal diameter m 1023 0.0011 0.0041 0.013
d.cr Crown width m 526 0.014 0.27 0.68
c.d Crown depth m 463 0.005 0.16 0.85
m.lf Leaf mass kg 1612 0.000003 0.00083 0.02
m.st Total stem mass kg 1612 0.000007 0.00062 0.024
m.so Aboveground mass kg 1612 0.000024 0.0015 0.039
m.br Branch mass kg 47 0 0.00011 0.00034
m.rt Total root mass kg 1612 0.000005 0.00053 0.035
m.to Total mass kg 1612 0.000031 0.0021 0.072
a.ilf Area of individual leaf m2 1609 0.00003 0.0029 0.051
ma.ilf Leaf mass per area kg m-2 1603 0.015 0.042 0.11
r.st Wood density kg m-3 1023 140 330 1130

plot of chunk world_map

And locally within the country:

plot of chunk country_map

The sites sampled are:

Location Longitude Latitude Vegetation
Riberalta, Bolivia -66 -11 Tropical rainforest

The growing conditions of sampled plants was:

Location growingCondition
Riberalta, Bolivia common garden

Species sampled

Species Family Pft
Aspidosperma ramiflorum Apocynaceae evergreen angiosperm, deciduous angiosperm
Aspidosperma tambopatense Apocynaceae evergreen angiosperm, deciduous angiosperm
Pouteria sp. Sapotaceae evergreen angiosperm, deciduous angiosperm
Euterpe precatoria Aracaceae evergreen angiosperm, deciduous angiosperm
Cedrelinga catanaeformis Fabaceae evergreen angiosperm, deciduous angiosperm
Tachigali vasquezii Fabaceae evergreen angiosperm, deciduous angiosperm
Berholletia excelsa Lecythidaceae evergreen angiosperm, deciduous angiosperm
Cecropia ficifolia Cecropiaceae evergreen angiosperm, deciduous angiosperm
Bellucia pentamera Melastomataceae evergreen angiosperm, deciduous angiosperm
Theobroma speciosum Sterculiaceae evergreen angiosperm, deciduous angiosperm
Schizolobium amazonicum Fabaceae evergreen angiosperm, deciduous angiosperm
Cedrela odorata Meliaceae evergreen angiosperm, deciduous angiosperm
Swietenia macrophylla Meliaceae evergreen angiosperm, deciduous angiosperm
Amburana cearensis Fabaceae evergreen angiosperm, deciduous angiosperm
Cariniana micrantha Lecythidaceae evergreen angiosperm, deciduous angiosperm

Methods used

Sampling strategy: A growth experiment was carried out using 15 rainforest tree species. The species were grown in shade houses representing 6 light levels (3, 6, 12, 25, 50 and 100% of full light) in Riberalta, Bolivia (11 degrees S, 66 degrees W). Seedlings were germinated from seed, or collected as wildings in the forest. The seedlings were aclimated for 15 weeks (range 2-36) to the shade house before a first harvest (on average 8 seedlings per species) was carried out. A second harvest (on average 10 seedlings per species) was carried out after 23 weeks (range (12-29). The experiment was carried out in 3 batches. Plants were grown in 5 l bags.

Leaf area: For each sapling, the total leaf area and average individual leaf area were measured using photocopied images or a leaf area meter.

Stem cross sectional area: Stem diameter was measured at the stem base using a calliper.

Height: Height was measured as the vertical distance from the ground to the highest apex.

Crown area: Crown width was measured at perpendicular right angles including the widest width. Projected area and volume were estimated by assuming a circle and using the average crown diameter.

Crown length: Crown length was measured as the difference between the height and the insertion point of the lowest leaf.

Biomass: Saplings were divided into root, stem, branches and petioles, and leaf lamina. Each compartment was dried to constant weight and weighed. Leaf petioles were not included in Total leaf mass. All parts of the saplings were weighed after being oven-dried at 70degC for at least 48 h.

Traits: LMA was calculated using a flatbed scanner or video imaged photocopies, for all leaves, wood density was calculated as (stem + branch [if present]+ petiole mass) over stem volume.

Year collected: 1994-1996

Plots of data

This is how the study Poorter1999 fits in the entire dataset (grey). each colour represents a species. A legend of species names with colours is included at the end for reports with 1 < n < 20 species.

plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots plot of chunk variable_plots

Clone this wiki locally