-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Non reproducibility in wf 136.793 #43293
Comments
assign reconstruction |
New categories assigned: reconstruction @jfernan2,@mandrenguyen you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
A new Issue was created by @perrotta Andrea Perrotta. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @Dr15Jones, @smuzaffar, @makortel can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cms-sw/tracking-pog-l2 |
From the log of tests of #43025 (comment) it seems the printout mentioned in the issue description comes from
|
With some little investigation made while in train, it seems to me that:
[1] at least I'm not seeing a large number of lines added/removed from the log in a PR that was tested on that IB |
I'm running valgrind memcheck on 136.793 and 11834.21 (I was already doing 11834.21 for #42700, I've updated to CMSSW_14_0_X_2023-11-16-1100 to cover this too) |
Log differences in #43310 (comment) show similar non-reproducibility in workflow 136.874 as well. The full message in question (in PR's tests) is
|
Is anyone investigating these non-reproducibilities? |
Is anybody looking into these? |
cms-bot internal usage |
type tracking |
It looks like that there is some non-reproducibility in (at least) workflow 136.793
It is witnessed by the following lines in the log, which appear quite often in different number and with different values in the bot tests when compared between baseline and baseline+PR
A couple of examples in #43025 (comment) and #43283 (e.g.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: