Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Use materialized views and views from SDK #2448

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

sfc-gh-asawicki
Copy link
Collaborator

  • views and materialized views are similar
  • set/unset tags was tested and fixed for both
  • tests were fixed

Copy link

Integration tests failure for b3447abe3196ae83504e802181a6ef0017f469d7

Copy link

Integration tests failure for 986b644df46cef7d5b052f02936c88264dcfbc11

@sfc-gh-asawicki sfc-gh-asawicki marked this pull request as ready for review January 30, 2024 15:08
Copy link

Integration tests failure for a9454d14883b2275089a306e7a811368a25bd017

1 similar comment
Copy link

Integration tests failure for a9454d14883b2275089a306e7a811368a25bd017

&sdk.In{Schema: schemaId},
))
if err != nil {
log.Printf("[DEBUG] failed when searching materialized views in schema (%s), err = %s", schemaId.FullyQualifiedName(), err.Error())
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does this throw an error if no materialized views are found?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, but it can fail for other reasons (e.g. not existing schema - added test to SDK to show that).

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
variable "name" {
type = string
}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should the vairables also be moved into the test.tf file?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What do you mean? For every test written this way, we have test.tf with config and variables.tf with variables.

pkg/resources/materialized_view.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/resources/materialized_view.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/resources/materialized_view_acceptance_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/resources/notification_integration.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/resources/view.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/resources/view_acceptance_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/resources/view_acceptance_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/snowflake/view.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

Integration tests failure for 3ef3f37305b0517ba9c0f73c1e6760308414a4a0

Copy link

Integration tests failure for 7d556fd64db2595765f02ed9269c9c43375b3fab

@sfc-gh-asawicki sfc-gh-asawicki merged commit dc66d02 into main Feb 1, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@sfc-gh-asawicki sfc-gh-asawicki deleted the use-materialized-views-and-views-from-sdk branch February 1, 2024 08:40
sfc-gh-jcieslak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.85.0](v0.84.1...v0.85.0)
(2024-02-01)


### 🎉 **What's new:**

* Add API integration to the SDK
([#2409](#2409))
([23acda5](23acda5))
* add application to sdk
([#2350](#2350))
([de97ad8](de97ad8))
* add external funcs to sdk
([#2440](#2440))
([c8cf09b](c8cf09b))
* Add grant privileges to share resource
([#2447](#2447))
([d8241a5](d8241a5))
* Add materialized view to the SDK
([#2403](#2403))
([a5ce699](a5ce699))
* Add notification integration to the SDK
([#2412](#2412))
([d84240c](d84240c))
* add sequences to sdk
([#2351](#2351))
([d2e5ffd](d2e5ffd))
* add snowflake grant privileges to account role
([#2365](#2365))
([e3d086e](e3d086e))
* add streamlits to sdk
([#2400](#2400))
([129d24c](129d24c))
* add-call-with to sdk
([#2337](#2337))
([ebcd1bc](ebcd1bc))
* stages migration follow-up
([#2372](#2372))
([3939dbe](3939dbe))
* Use API integration from SDK
([#2429](#2429))
([1ccc864](1ccc864))
* Use managed account from the SDK
([#2420](#2420))
([3aaa080](3aaa080))
* Use materialized views and views from SDK
([#2448](#2448))
([dc66d02](dc66d02))
* Use notification integration from sdk
([#2445](#2445))
([e8915cc](e8915cc))
* use roles from the SDK
([#2405](#2405))
([c645b4d](c645b4d))
* Use row access policy from SDK
([#2428](#2428))
([119af5e](119af5e))
* Use SDK in the storage integration
([#2380](#2380))
([ce0741c](ce0741c))
* use sequence from sdk and add ordering attr
([#2419](#2419))
([973b8f7](973b8f7)),
closes
[#2387](#2387)
* Use stage from sdk
([#2427](#2427))
([c17effd](c17effd))


### 🔧 **Misc**

* add missing deprecation message
([#2451](#2451))
([77de569](77de569))


### 🐛 **Bug fixes:**

* account role test
([#2422](#2422))
([c1b47d1](c1b47d1))
* Adjust tests after Snowflake behavior change
([#2404](#2404))
([8c03ffb](8c03ffb))
* app-pkg unset
([#2399](#2399))
([fedb1df](fedb1df))
* Fix some bugs
([#2421](#2421))
([dec7cd9](dec7cd9)),
closes
[#2358](#2358)
[#2369](#2369)
[#2329](#2329)
* snowflake_grant_privileges_to_role read
([#2424](#2424))
([5385cec](5385cec))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: snowflake-release-please[bot] <105954990+snowflake-release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants