remove stuck-TBM specific workflows

[mmusich]

PR description:

PR #25524 introduced two specific workflows to be able to test the SiPixel Bad FED Channel simulation (a.k.a. stuck-TBM simulation).
With the activation of the feature by default in PR #26275 and the provision of Ultra-Legacy conditions for the records SiPixelStatusScenarioProbabilityRcd and SiPixelStatusScenariosRcd for the 2017 MC in PR #27342 and for 2018 MC in PR #27683, these workflows are now superfluous and can be removed.

PR validation:

Run the usual limited matrix tests:

$ runTheMatrix.py -l limited -t 4 -j 8 --ibeos

which completed without errors.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:

This PR is not a backport

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27692/11294

• This PR adds an extra 52KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_steps.py modified in PR(s): Add bx skim and corresponding RelVal #26476
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py modified in PR(s): Phase-2 InnerTracker conditions from DB (version 2) #27517, Phase2-hcx214 Add a new scenario and workflow with latest Phase2 configuration including HFNose #27665, [HGCal] New fragments for special HGCal RelVal requests #27631

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation
SimTracker/SiPixelDigitizer

@cmsbuild, @prebello, @zhenhu, @civanch, @kpedro88, @pgunnell, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @dkotlins, @ebrondol, @threus, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[fabiocos]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/1835/console Started: 2019/08/05 17:49

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 9ab93c4
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-56ac12/1835/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-56ac12/1835/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-56ac12/11634.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2021_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2021+RecoFull_2021+HARVESTFull_2021+ALCAFull_2021

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2715989
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2715659
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 329
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
• Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

[civanch]

+1

[fabiocos]

@prebello @zhenhu this move makes sense to me, could you please check and approve it?

[prebello]

+1

[fabiocos]

+1

@kpedro88 please have a look at your earliest convenience, I believe it is ok to move forward

[fabiocos]

merge

[kpedro88]

+upgrade

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.