Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add verbose option to BeamSpotRcdPrinter and use it in the unit tests #43291

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2023

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Nov 15, 2023

PR description:

Title says it all, in response to #43265 (comment)

PR validation:

Run unit tests of the package scram b runtests

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

N/A

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43291/37701

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • CondTools/BeamSpot (db, alca)

@saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @cmsbuild, @perrotta, @consuegs can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rsreds, @mmusich, @yuanchao, @tocheng, @PonIlya this is something you requested to watch as well.
@sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Nov 15, 2023

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-08d1ed/35855/summary.html
COMMIT: 27efde0
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2023-11-15-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/43291/35855/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 183 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 22 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3363070
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1403
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3361645
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • Checked 214 log files, 167 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Nov 17, 2023

is there anything stopping integration of this?

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich there's a merge conflict now, can you fix? thanks.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43291/37766

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

  • There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #43291 was updated. @francescobrivio, @perrotta, @saumyaphor4252, @consuegs can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-08d1ed/35921/summary.html
COMMIT: 65ac130
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2023-11-17-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/43291/35921/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-08d1ed/35921/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-08d1ed/35921/git-merge-result

Unit Tests

I found 2 errors in the following unit tests:

---> test runtestRecoEgammaElectronIdentification had ERRORS
---> test testTauEmbeddingProducers had ERRORS

RelVals

----- Begin Fatal Exception 17-Nov-2023 17:51:10 CET-----------------------
An exception of category 'MVA config failure: ' occurred while
   [0] Constructing the EventProcessor
   [1] Constructing module: class=ElectronMVAValueMapProducer label='electronMVAValueMapProducer'
Exception Message:
Concerning ElectronMVAEstimatorRun2RunIIIWinter22NoIsoV1
Variable ele_hcalPFClusterIso not found in variable definition file!
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------
----- Begin Fatal Exception 17-Nov-2023 17:51:10 CET-----------------------
An exception of category 'MVA config failure: ' occurred while
   [0] Constructing the EventProcessor
   [1] Constructing module: class=ElectronMVAValueMapProducer label='electronMVAValueMapProducer'
Exception Message:
Concerning ElectronMVAEstimatorRun2RunIIIWinter22NoIsoV1
Variable ele_hcalPFClusterIso not found in variable definition file!
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------
----- Begin Fatal Exception 17-Nov-2023 17:51:11 CET-----------------------
An exception of category 'MVA config failure: ' occurred while
   [0] Constructing the EventProcessor
   [1] Constructing module: class=ElectronMVAValueMapProducer label='electronMVAValueMapProducer'
Exception Message:
Concerning ElectronMVAEstimatorRun2RunIIIWinter22NoIsoV1
Variable ele_hcalPFClusterIso not found in variable definition file!
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------
Expand to see more relval errors ...

RelVals-INPUT

  • 4.64.6_MinimumBias2010A/step2_MinimumBias2010A.log
  • 136.72411136.72411_RunJetHT2016B_reminiaodUL/step2_RunJetHT2016B_reminiaodUL.log
  • 136.72412136.72412_RunJetHT2016B_reminiaodUL/step2_RunJetHT2016B_reminiaodUL.log
Expand to see more relval errors ...

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Nov 18, 2023

please test

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Nov 18, 2023

@perrotta you might want to sign again irrespective of the failed test (due to the broken IB). Last push just resolved the merge conflict

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@perrotta you might want to sign again irrespective of the failed test (due to the broken IB). Last push just resolved the merge conflict

Indeed...
And rerunning the tests won't change their outcome, I fear

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

The failing workflow are not identically the same as the ones failing in the IB. They certainly have the same origin, but let have a look at the new tests just launched first.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Nov 18, 2023

They certainly have the same origin, but let have a look at the new tests just launched first.

There is absolutely no point in that, as the PR is not touching any code used in relvals. Why are you deliberately delaying the merge here (and many other PRs in the past)?

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

There is absolutely no point in that, as the PR is not touching any code used in relvals. Why are you deliberately delaying the merge here (and many other PRs in the past)?

Even if the release managers decide to keep integrating in spite of the storm of errors in the IBs after the last merging of 22 PRs all at once, I imagine that given their time zones none of them two will wake up before 11 am (CET) to integrate new ones in time for the 1100 IB.

Since you relaunched the tests (unnecessarily, in my opinion) let them finish and have a look at their output, as I am curious to see whether the errors keeps appearing in different workflows as in the IB. (And please don't answer "the tests will finish even if you sign this PR now": I know it)

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Nov 18, 2023

, I imagine that given their time zones none of them two will wake up before 11 am (CET) to integrate new ones in time for the 1100 IB.

that's a moot point. This PR is orp signed. Once the test finish (I think successfully), this PR will be automatically merged.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-08d1ed/35937/summary.html
COMMIT: 65ac130
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2023-11-17-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/43291/35937/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit d721800 into cms-sw:master Nov 18, 2023
@mmusich mmusich deleted the mm_lessVerbose_BeamSpotRcdPrinte branch November 18, 2023 13:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants