Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[master] Drop references to legacy generators #37813

Merged

Conversation

iarspider
Copy link
Contributor

@iarspider iarspider commented May 5, 2022

PR description:

Drop references to legacy generators. Forward port of PRs opened for DEVEL_X branch.

Original PRs: #37610, #37611, #37612, #37616;
cmsdist PR: cms-sw/cmsdist#7844

PR validation:

Validated in the original PRs and in DEVEL IBs

@iarspider
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test with cms-sw/cmsdist#7844

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 5, 2022

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37813/29729

  • This PR adds an extra 8KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 5, 2022

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37813/29732

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 5, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @iarspider for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • FWCore/Concurrency (core)
  • GeneratorInterface/CascadeInterface (generators)
  • GeneratorInterface/ExternalDecays (generators)
  • GeneratorInterface/Herwig6Interface (generators)
  • GeneratorInterface/MCatNLOInterface (generators)
  • GeneratorInterface/PhotosInterface (generators)
  • GeneratorInterface/PomwigInterface (generators)
  • PhysicsTools/JetMCAlgos (analysis)

@SiewYan, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @mkirsano, @makortel, @Saptaparna, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @alberto-sanchez, @santocch can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@AlexDeMoor, @emilbols, @mkirsano, @makortel, @wddgit, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @alberto-sanchez, @andrzejnovak, @demuller this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@iarspider
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test with cms-sw/cmsdist#7844

@iarspider
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 5, 2022

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3762f/24475/summary.html
COMMIT: 3320b41
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-05-05-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/37813/24475/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3762f/24475/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3762f/24475/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2970 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3700704
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6318
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3694364
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 206 log files, 45 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 48 workflows

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 6, 2022

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3762f/24491/summary.html
COMMIT: 3320b41
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-05-05-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/37813/24491/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3762f/24491/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3762f/24491/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2968 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3700704
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6312
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3694370
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 206 log files, 45 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 48 workflows

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@cms-sw/generators-l2 , any idea why there are a lot of dqm comparison differences for workflow 9.0 ?

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

makortel commented May 6, 2022

any idea why there are a lot of dqm comparison differences for workflow 9.0 ?

These occurred also in #37592 (comment) (which was purely technical). I guessed (without any investigation) it might be related to #34448, but given the affected workflow was always 9.0, maybe it could be related to the generator setup of that workflow.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@cms-sw/generators-l2 @cms-sw/analysis-l2 can you please review this? This has been integrated in DELVEL IBs and all workflows run fine. This update should allow us to drop the legacy generators packages from cmssw distribution

@Saptaparna
Copy link
Contributor

+1 since all the other PRs were fine and merged. @SiewYan thanks for running the tests!

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented May 9, 2022

@cms-sw/generators-l2 @cms-sw/analysis-l2 can you please review this? This has been integrated in DELVEL IBs and all workflows run fine. This update should allow us to drop the legacy generators packages from cmssw distribution

@smuzaffar analysis signature is dummy.
As orp I am fine with this PR, and I will merge it together with https://github.com/cms-sw/cmsdist/pull/7844/files as soon as it will get signed by @cms-sw/core-l2

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

makortel commented May 9, 2022

+core

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented May 9, 2022

+1

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented May 9, 2022

merge

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit cb9d1c6 into cms-sw:master May 9, 2022
@iarspider iarspider deleted the drop-legacy-generators-master branch May 9, 2022 19:10
@santocch
Copy link

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants