-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Give more context in case of an ExternalGenerator error #37769
Give more context in case of an ExternalGenerator error #37769
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37769/29659
|
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages:
@SiewYan, @mkirsano, @Saptaparna, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @alberto-sanchez can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6218d7/24394/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@Dr15Jones , the test [*] suggested that: Non-const variable 'std::string s_uniqueID' is static and might be thread-unsafe not sure will it break in application.. |
The fail test is working [*], its looking ok for me. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@Dr15Jones indeed I share the same doubt as @SiewYan : is the newly defined |
b6c013b
to
d9b1623
Compare
Sorry for not getting back sooner. Within cmsRun, this would definitely be a concern. In this case, this is part of the external application and that application only uses 1 thread (since it is running an instance of a non-thread safe generator). I've properly annotated the variable so the test should pass now. |
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37769/29712
|
Pull request #37769 was updated. @alberto-sanchez, @SiewYan, @mkirsano, @Saptaparna, @GurpreetSinghChahal can you please check and sign again. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6218d7/24444/summary.html Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Summary:
|
Thank you @Dr15Jones for the correction! However i found another similar thread safety issue on Thanks |
@SiewYan thanks for looking at the PR issues! As it is still part of the same single threaded application (externalGenerator) thread safety is not an issue (plus has been there since the beginning). Do you want me to add the same annotation in the PR or do it in another PR? |
+1 @Dr15Jones , you may add the same annotation in another PR though, for completeness. This PR is good to go. Thanks! |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
We are seeing infrequent errors in the IB and I was hoping to get a bit more context to help diagnose what is happening.
PR validation:
Please test.