Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(app): do not check mag block in calibration status #13799

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

shlokamin
Copy link
Member

Overview

There was a bug in the useModuleCalibrationStatus hook where we were looking for cal info for a mag block (which doesnt need to be calibrated).

closes RQA-1805

Risk assessment

Low

@shlokamin shlokamin requested a review from a team as a code owner October 16, 2023 21:36
@shlokamin shlokamin requested review from koji and mjhuff and removed request for a team October 16, 2023 21:36
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 16, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #13799 (c2e6ef1) into chore_release-7.0.1 (791dbe7) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on chore_release-7.0.1.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##           chore_release-7.0.1   #13799   +/-   ##
====================================================
  Coverage                71.23%   71.23%           
====================================================
  Files                     2432     2432           
  Lines                    68407    68430   +23     
  Branches                  8047     8064   +17     
====================================================
+ Hits                     48727    48748   +21     
- Misses                   17791    17792    +1     
- Partials                  1889     1890    +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
app 68.82% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
...anisms/Devices/hooks/useModuleCalibrationStatus.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Contributor

@mjhuff mjhuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't seem to affect anything else and solves the problem. LGTM!

@shlokamin shlokamin merged commit 8cabf5a into chore_release-7.0.1 Oct 16, 2023
28 checks passed
@shlokamin shlokamin deleted the app_fix-module-cal-hook branch October 16, 2023 23:48
y3rsh added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2023
* edge: (77 commits)
  fix(app): update move gantry text in change pipette flow (#13712)
  fix(app): fix CI after release merge back (#13816)
  chore(hardware): add opentrons hardware package to ot 2 build (#13770)
  feat(protocol-designer): correct step count in create file wizard (#13807)
  feat(protocol-designer): error handling in create file wizard (#13804)
  fix(app): invalidate OT2 calibration queries when calibration flows complete (#13809)
  always jog (#13806)
  chore(app): point updates at dns not s3 (#13798)
  docs(api): updated Flex default flow rates (#13796)
  fix(api): Flag pipette as not ready to aspirate after pushing out air (#13728)
  fix(api, hardware): allow OT3Controller to disable tip motors (#13805)
  more blank trials; longer scale stabilize wait; submerge 2.5mm (#13788)
  fix(app): unload adapters after checking position of labware on adapter on heater shaker module (#13803)
  feat(app): wire up location conflict modal for ODD (#13797)
  feat(app): add Deck configuration page component (#13784)
  fix(robot-server): add default to robot serial (#13802)
  feat(protocol-designer, components): prep work for deck config in PD (#13775)
  feat(app, protocol-designer): plug in waste chute asset (#13800)
  fix(app): do not check mag block in calibration status (#13799)
  feat(protocol-designer): edit additional items staging area support (#13752)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants