Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge public v2 #295

Merged
merged 59 commits into from
Apr 19, 2021
Merged

Merge public v2 #295

merged 59 commits into from
Apr 19, 2021

Conversation

fossell
Copy link
Contributor

@fossell fossell commented Apr 9, 2021

This commit merges the release/public-v2 branch into develop and resolves Issue #295. Changes are minimal and include:

  • Updates to documentation files
  • Updating naming convention in parm/makefile to be consistent with LAM (SAR --> LAM)
  • Removal of community build mechanisms including removal of comlibs directory and crtm submodule
  • Renaming community run script to be consistent with executable name
  • Updates to module files for Odin and Stampede platforms

hertneky and others added 30 commits August 17, 2020 16:33
Documentation modifications for release/public-v2
gfortran 10.x treats argument mismatch as error
Add (gnu) compiler option to allow argument mismatch. (NOAA-EMC#179)
Change nomenclature of SAR config files to use "LAM" instead of "SAR"  per SRW team.
Updated support on Odin & Stampede to use NCEPLIBS public-v2 release
…te_cmakemodules

release/public-v2: fix problem linking to static NetCDF libraries
Starting release/public-v2 branch with UPP version 9.0.0
Modified UPP stand-alone run script with name change to run_upp
* Fix of total cloud fraction in CLDRAD.f for FV3/LAMX.

* Setting  iSF_SURFACE_PHYSICS as 2 in regional FV3 read interface.
@fossell fossell requested review from WenMeng-NOAA and hertneky April 9, 2021 16:23
@fossell
Copy link
Contributor Author

fossell commented Apr 9, 2021

@ywangwof - Can you please confirm the changes you added in public-v2 for Odin and Stampede module files are still correct and should be merged into develop branch?

@ywangwof
Copy link
Contributor

ywangwof commented Apr 9, 2021

@ywangwof - Can you please confirm the changes you added in public-v2 for Odin and Stampede module files are still correct and should be merged into develop branch?

As I understand, we will not need those changes because we are using cmake to build the programs and the configuration will be handled in the SRW app level, right?

Copy link
Contributor

@mkavulich mkavulich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me; my comments are very minor text changes, just things I noticed while reading through.

docs/Installation.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/Regridding.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@WenMeng-NOAA WenMeng-NOAA linked an issue Apr 12, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
@fossell
Copy link
Contributor Author

fossell commented Apr 12, 2021

@ywangwof - Can you please confirm the changes you added in public-v2 for Odin and Stampede module files are still correct and should be merged into develop branch?

As I understand, we will not need those changes because we are using cmake to build the programs and the configuration will be handled in the SRW app level, right?

@ywangwof - Yes if using the SRW app, set up and build is handled there and via cmake. I can revert these changes then if not needed.

@fossell fossell linked an issue Apr 12, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
…v is handled at app level for these machines
@fossell
Copy link
Contributor Author

fossell commented Apr 12, 2021

@WenMeng-NOAA - Code passed reg tests on Hera. Ready for your final review.

Copy link
Contributor

@hertneky hertneky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me.

@WenMeng-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@fossell The changes look good to me. I will schedule merging after the PR #294.

@WenMeng-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@fossell It might take more time for tweaking the PR #294. I am thinking merging your PR first. Please let me know if this plan works to you.

@fossell
Copy link
Contributor Author

fossell commented Apr 19, 2021

@WenMeng-NOAA - Yes, that is fine with me. Just let me know what I can do to help.

@WenMeng-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@fossell After your branch is synced, I will start to the regression tests.
Also Yali updated her current issue in the issue #272, please let us know if the DTC could help that. Thanks!

@fossell
Copy link
Contributor Author

fossell commented Apr 19, 2021

@WenMeng-NOAA - Branch has been updated.

parm/makefile Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@WenMeng-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

The UPP regression tests were conducted on WCOSS and Hera. No changed results were found. This PR is ready for merging.

@WenMeng-NOAA WenMeng-NOAA merged commit 557ab31 into NOAA-EMC:develop Apr 19, 2021
@fossell
Copy link
Contributor Author

fossell commented Apr 22, 2021

@fossell After your branch is synced, I will start to the regression tests.
Also Yali updated her current issue in the issue #272, please let us know if the DTC could help that. Thanks!

@WenMeng-NOAA - I have not had a chance to look at issue #272. Our planning year ends next week so we are working on finishing up final tasks. But I will try to look as soon as I can.

EricJames-NOAA pushed a commit to EricJames-NOAA/UPP that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2022
… GSD_HRRR25km grid. (NOAA-EMC#295)

## DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES: 
* Add new subconus 3km grid of ESGgrid type named GSD_SUBCONUS3km.
* Allow this as well as the GSD_HRRR25km, GSD_HRRR13km, and GSD_RAP13km grids to run in NCO mode.
* Add new WE2E test for the GSD_SUBCONUS3km grid in NCO mode named nco_GSD_SUBCONUS3km_HRRRX_RAPX.
* Add new WE2E test for the GSD_HRRR25km grid in NCO mode named nco_GSD_HRRR25km_HRRRX_RAPX.

## TESTS CONDUCTED: 
Ran the two new WE2E tests on hera -- nco_GSD_SUBCONUS3km_HRRRX_RAPX and nco_GSD_HRRR25km_HRRRX_RAPX.  Both completed successfully.  The changes do not affect any of the other WE2E tests, so those were not run.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Merge release/public-v2 Can CRTM submodule be deleted?
8 participants