Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 297 #298

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 7, 2024
Merged

Issue 297 #298

merged 7 commits into from
Dec 7, 2024

Conversation

sca075
Copy link
Owner

@sca075 sca075 commented Dec 6, 2024

Adding verifications when the sensors are updated.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced error handling for sensor data processing in the vacuum camera component.
    • Improved logic for determining the current room and last loaded map, ensuring more accurate data retrieval.
    • Introduced asynchronous image handling for improved camera performance and responsiveness.
    • Added conditional checks to ensure all necessary data is present before processing obstacle links.
    • Enhanced handling of obstacle data with improved logging and control flow adjustments in the image drawing component.
    • Updated version number for the mqtt_vacuum_camera component to 2024.12.1.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted conditions for setting vacuum_room and last_loaded_map, improving the reliability of the data returned.
    • Enhanced logging for better error reporting during image processing and obstacle data handling.

@sca075 sca075 self-assigned this Dec 6, 2024
@sca075 sca075 added enhancement New feature or request Fixes for issues labels Dec 6, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications across several files in the mqtt_vacuum_camera component. Key updates include enhanced error handling in the async_update_sensor_data method of the MQTTVacuumCoordinator class, which now captures exceptions during sensor data processing. The logic for setting vacuum_room and last_loaded_map has been refined, ensuring proper defaults are assigned when data is missing. Additionally, the MQTTCamera class has seen improvements in image handling and camera mode processing, while the compose_obstacle_links function has added checks for required parameters. The version number has also been updated.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/coordinator.py Enhanced error handling in async_update_sensor_data, refined logic for vacuum_room and last_loaded_map, modified return statement for formatted_data.
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py Introduced async_open_image for non-blocking image handling, refined camera mode handling, improved error logging, and updated version number.
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/common.py Added checks in compose_obstacle_links to ensure required parameters are present before processing.
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/hypfer/image_draw.py Enhanced obstacle data handling, refined error handling, adjusted control flow in drawing methods, and improved logging.
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/manifest.json Updated version number from "2024.12.0" to "2024.12.1".
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/MQTT/connector.py Improved handling of MQTT messages and vacuum state management, added conditional logic for IP address processing.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Coordinator
    participant SensorData
    participant Logger

    Coordinator->>SensorData: async_update_sensor_data(sensor_data)
    alt Exception Occurs
        SensorData-->>Coordinator: Raise Exception
        Coordinator->>Logger: Log Warning
        Coordinator-->>SensorData: Return SENSOR_NO_DATA
    else No Exception
        Coordinator->>SensorData: Process Data
        Coordinator-->>SensorData: Return Processed Data
    end
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f79f589 and 8b425ed.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/coordinator.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/coordinator.py (2)

146-147: Solid error handling addition! 🛡️

The new try-except block with warning-level logging is a clean way to handle sensor data processing issues without crashing.

Also applies to: 181-183


149-150: Let's verify those external values! 🔍

The battery_level and vacuum_state are fetched from the connector but used without validation.

Let's check how these values are handled in the connector:

Also applies to: 169-170

✅ Verification successful

All good in the hood! Values are properly handled! 🎯

The battery level and vacuum status are well-managed in the connector:

  • Battery level is properly initialized, set via MQTT messages, and safely returned as a string
  • Vacuum status handles error states, fires appropriate events, and includes fallback states
  • Both values are properly validated before being used in the coordinator
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for battery level and vacuum status implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'get_battery_level() {
  $$$
}'

ast-grep --pattern 'get_vacuum_status() {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 105


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different pattern to find these methods, including async variants
ast-grep --pattern 'async get_battery_level'
ast-grep --pattern 'async get_vacuum_status'

# Backup search with ripgrep for these method names
rg "get_battery_level" -A 5
rg "get_vacuum_status" -A 5

# Let's also check the connector class definition
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
  $$$
  get_battery_level
  $$$
}'

# Search for the connector implementation file
fd "connector.py"

Length of output: 5413


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how these values are handled in the connector class
cat custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/MQTT/connector.py

# Also check where the battery level and vacuum status are set
rg "_mqtt_vac_battery_level" -A 3
rg "_mqtt_vac_stat" -A 3

Length of output: 25580

custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/coordinator.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/coordinator.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
- Reduced THRead from 3 to 1 for the image download.
- Added more logging to check the CameraMode.
- Added async immage load.
- Safe Fail link creation using vacuum api

Signed-off-by: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py (1)

343-345: Typo tweak: 'piyels' should groove as 'pixels'

Spotted a tiny typo in the debug message. Keeping it typo-free keeps our logs crystal clear!

Apply this diff to fix it:

 _LOGGER.debug(
-    f"Finding in the nearest {min_distance} piyels obstacle to coordinates: {x}, {y}"
+    f"Finding the nearest {min_distance} pixels obstacle to coordinates: {x}, {y}"
 )
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/common.py (1)

255-255: Simplify: Remove the unnecessary 'f' prefix

The debug message doesn't need an f since there are no variables to interpolate. Let's keep it clean.

Apply this diff:

-_LOGGER.debug(f"Obstacle links: linked data complete.")
+_LOGGER.debug("Obstacle links: linked data complete.")
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

255-255: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b425ed and a0f4e9e.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py (8 hunks)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/common.py (2 hunks)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/hypfer/image_draw.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/common.py

255-255: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py (3)

3-3: Version bump looks sleek!

The version update to v2024.12.1 is spot-on.


251-253: Smooth transition to MAP_VIEW mode with proper polling

Updating the camera mode to MAP_VIEW, setting _should_poll to True, and calling async_update() ensures the camera stays in sync.


293-295: Consistent camera mode updates rock!

You're consistently updating self._shared.camera_mode and logging the changes, which keeps things transparent and maintainable.

Also applies to: 312-314, 322-324, 327-329

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/coordinator.py (1)

182-184: Catch specific exceptions for clarity

Catching the broad Exception can hide issues. It's cooler to catch specific exceptions to make debugging easier.

custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py (1)

394-395: Simplify 'async with' statements for a sleeker look

Combine your nested 'async with' statements into one line to keep the code clean and stylish.

Apply this diff to refine the code:

-                async with aiohttp.ClientSession() as session:
-                    async with session.get(url) as response:
+                async with aiohttp.ClientSession() as session, session.get(url) as response:
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

394-395: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements

(SIM117)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a0f4e9e and b249beb.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py (13 hunks)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/coordinator.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/hypfer/image_draw.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/hypfer/image_draw.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py

394-395: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements

(SIM117)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/coordinator.py (1)

157-158: Oops! Fix the dictionary syntax

You've got a comma instead of a colon when creating the dictionary. Change {"name", "Default"} to {"name": "Default"} to keep things smooth.

custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py (1)

370-375: Reuse the ThreadPoolExecutor for better performance

Creating a new ThreadPoolExecutor every time can slow things down. Let's speed it up by reusing a single executor instance.

image_draw.py logging too much data for the obstacles no data logged anymore.

Signed-off-by: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/MQTT/connector.py (2)

413-415: Add IP address validation and error handling

The IP address handling logic is good, but could be more robust. Consider adding validation and error handling.

-            else:
-                # Use IPV4 when no IPV6 without split
-                self._shared.vacuum_ips = vacuum_host_ip
+            else:
+                try:
+                    # Validate IPv4 format using simple string checks
+                    if all(0 <= int(part) <= 255 for part in vacuum_host_ip.split('.')):
+                        self._shared.vacuum_ips = vacuum_host_ip
+                    else:
+                        _LOGGER.warning(f"Invalid IPv4 format: {vacuum_host_ip}")
+                except (AttributeError, ValueError) as e:
+                    _LOGGER.error(f"Error parsing vacuum IP: {e}")

416-416: Enhance debug logging for better troubleshooting

The debug log could be more descriptive about which IP format was selected.

-            _LOGGER.debug(f"Vacuum IPs: {self._shared.vacuum_ips}")
+            _LOGGER.debug(
+                f"Vacuum IP ({'IPv4 from dual-stack' if ',' in vacuum_host_ip else 'direct IPv4'}): "
+                f"{self._shared.vacuum_ips}"
+            )
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b249beb and 606ae7f.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/manifest.json (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/MQTT/connector.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/hypfer/image_draw.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/manifest.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/hypfer/image_draw.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/MQTT/connector.py (1)
Learnt from: sca075
PR: sca075/mqtt_vacuum_camera#253
File: custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/MQTT/connector.py:347-349
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T05:06:42.185Z
Learning: In the `ValetudoConnector`, when handling the MQTT command topic in `async_message_received`, `msg.payload` can be used directly without decoding, as `async_decode_mqtt_payload` immediately returns the payload without encoding for this attribute.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py (3)

250-252: Consider adding state transition logging

The camera mode transition could benefit from more detailed logging to help with debugging.

-            _LOGGER.debug(f"Camera Mode Change to {self._shared.camera_mode}")
+            _LOGGER.debug(f"Camera Mode transitioning from {CameraModes.OBSTACLE_VIEW} to {self._shared.camera_mode}")

342-344: Consider making the distance threshold configurable

The hardcoded 500-pixel distance threshold for finding the nearest obstacle might not work well for all map sizes and resolutions.

-        min_distance = 500  # Start with a very large distance
+        # Default to 500 pixels if not configured
+        min_distance = self._shared.get_config("obstacle_distance_threshold", 500)

Line range hint 380-406: Nice async refactor of download_image! 🎯

The refactored download_image method is now properly async without blocking operations. Good error handling and logging too!

However, we can optimize the context managers:

-            async with aiohttp.ClientSession() as session:
-                async with session.get(url) as response:
+            async with aiohttp.ClientSession() as session, session.get(url) as response:
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

394-395: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements

(SIM117)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 606ae7f and b8b0fea.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py (10 hunks)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/coordinator.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/hypfer/image_draw.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/hypfer/image_draw.py
  • custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/coordinator.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py (1)
Learnt from: sca075
PR: sca075/mqtt_vacuum_camera#298
File: custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py:361-376
Timestamp: 2024-12-07T11:16:20.866Z
Learning: Reusing a single `ThreadPoolExecutor` in the `MQTTCamera` class's `async_open_image` method in `custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py` is not suitable, as it causes the code to not work properly.
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py

394-395: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements

(SIM117)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py (3)

3-3: Version bump looks good! 🚀

Version updated from v2024.12.0 to v2024.12.1.


361-376: Keep the current ThreadPoolExecutor implementation

Based on the learning from previous reviews, reusing a single ThreadPoolExecutor instance doesn't work properly in this context. The current implementation creating a new executor for each operation is the correct approach.


Line range hint 683-696: ThreadPoolExecutor usage looks good! 🎯

The implementation correctly uses a new ThreadPoolExecutor instance with proper thread naming for debugging.

@sca075 sca075 merged commit 9cb90da into main Dec 7, 2024
6 checks passed
@sca075 sca075 deleted the refactoring_camera branch December 7, 2024 11:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Fixes for issues
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing calibration data @ Version > 2024.10.0 and RE(rand256) Firmware Obstacle View - Missing IP address
1 participant