Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dcim/cables/Filters/Attributes/Length > UI Field wrong Validation #15685

Closed
serge-deiss-obt opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #15703
Closed

dcim/cables/Filters/Attributes/Length > UI Field wrong Validation #15685

serge-deiss-obt opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #15703
Assignees
Labels
severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application

Comments

@serge-deiss-obt
Copy link

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

NetBox Version

340fef3a5305 (v3.7.5)

Python Version

3.11

Steps to Reproduce

  1. https://domain/dcim/cables/
  2. Filters
  3. Attributes
  4. Length > it is not possible to filter for decimal lengths like 1.5 m Cables but they can be set as such.

Expected Behavior

It should be possible to use decimal as not all cables come in full numbers and i doubt people drop to a lower metric to describe 150cm instead of 1.5m. Especially since you can set these values on the Cables themselve.

Observed Behavior

image

@serge-deiss-obt serge-deiss-obt added status: needs triage This issue is awaiting triage by a maintainer type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application labels Apr 10, 2024
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available and removed status: needs triage This issue is awaiting triage by a maintainer labels Apr 10, 2024
@arthanson arthanson self-assigned this Apr 11, 2024
@arthanson arthanson removed the status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation label Apr 11, 2024
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation label Apr 15, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 15, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants