[syzkaller] WARNING in page_counter_cancel #252

mjmartineau · 2022-01-05T16:39:09Z

Andrew Morton noted an mptcp-related report by syzbot (incorrectly attributed to the mm subsystem):

https://lore.kernel.org/mptcp/[email protected]/T/#m30e702b6441359de0f5f1e079f173b4ca19ca908

As Michal Hocko notes:

__mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial is trying to uncharge (via __sk_mem_reduce_allocated) negative amount.
nr_pages has overflown when converted from int to unsigned int (-1). I would say that 
__mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial has evaluated
	reclaimable = mptcp_sk(sk)->rmem_fwd_alloc - sk_unused_reserved_mem(sk)
to 0 and __mptcp_rmem_reclaim(sk, reclaimable - 1) made it -1.

This was detected in Linus' tree.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

syzbot found a page counter underflow that was triggered by MPTCP's reclaim code: page_counter underflow: -4294964789 nr_pages=4294967295 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3785 at mm/page_counter.c:56 page_counter_cancel+0xcf/0xe0 mm/page_counter.c:56 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 3785 Comm: kworker/2:6 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events mptcp_worker RIP: 0010:page_counter_cancel+0xcf/0xe0 mm/page_counter.c:56 Code: c7 04 24 00 00 00 00 45 31 f6 eb 97 e8 2a 2b b5 ff 4c 89 ea 48 89 ee 48 c7 c7 00 9e b8 89 c6 05 a0 c1 ba 0b 01 e8 95 e4 4b 07 <0f> 0b eb a8 4c 89 e7 e8 25 5a fb ff eb c7 0f 1f 00 41 56 41 55 49 RSP: 0018:ffffc90002d4f918 EFLAGS: 00010082 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88806a494120 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff8880688c41c0 RSI: ffffffff815e8f28 RDI: fffff520005a9f15 RBP: ffffffff000009cb R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffffff815e2cfe R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88806a494120 R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88802cc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b2de21000 CR3: 000000005ad59000 CR4: 0000000000150ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> page_counter_uncharge+0x2e/0x60 mm/page_counter.c:160 drain_stock+0xc1/0x180 mm/memcontrol.c:2219 refill_stock+0x139/0x2f0 mm/memcontrol.c:2271 __sk_mem_reduce_allocated+0x24d/0x550 net/core/sock.c:2945 __mptcp_rmem_reclaim net/mptcp/protocol.c:167 [inline] __mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial+0x124/0x410 net/mptcp/protocol.c:975 mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial net/mptcp/protocol.c:982 [inline] mptcp_alloc_tx_skb net/mptcp/protocol.c:1212 [inline] mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x18c6/0x2190 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1279 __mptcp_push_pending+0x232/0x720 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1545 mptcp_release_cb+0xfe/0x200 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2975 release_sock+0xb4/0x1b0 net/core/sock.c:3306 mptcp_worker+0x51e/0xc10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2443 process_one_work+0x9b2/0x1690 kernel/workqueue.c:2298 worker_thread+0x658/0x11f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2445 kthread+0x405/0x4f0 kernel/kthread.c:327 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 </TASK> __mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial() could call __mptcp_rmem_reclaim() with a negative value, which passed that negative value to __sk_mem_reduce_allocated() and triggered the splat above. Check for a reclaim amount that is positive and large enough for __mptcp_rmem_reclaim() to actually adjust rmem_fwd_alloc (much like the sk_mem_reclaim_partial() code the function is based on). Fixes: 6511882 ("mptcp: allocate fwd memory separately on the rx and tx path") Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#252 Cc: [email protected] Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>

syzbot found a page counter underflow that was triggered by MPTCP's reclaim code: page_counter underflow: -4294964789 nr_pages=4294967295 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3785 at mm/page_counter.c:56 page_counter_cancel+0xcf/0xe0 mm/page_counter.c:56 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 3785 Comm: kworker/2:6 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events mptcp_worker RIP: 0010:page_counter_cancel+0xcf/0xe0 mm/page_counter.c:56 Code: c7 04 24 00 00 00 00 45 31 f6 eb 97 e8 2a 2b b5 ff 4c 89 ea 48 89 ee 48 c7 c7 00 9e b8 89 c6 05 a0 c1 ba 0b 01 e8 95 e4 4b 07 <0f> 0b eb a8 4c 89 e7 e8 25 5a fb ff eb c7 0f 1f 00 41 56 41 55 49 RSP: 0018:ffffc90002d4f918 EFLAGS: 00010082 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88806a494120 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff8880688c41c0 RSI: ffffffff815e8f28 RDI: fffff520005a9f15 RBP: ffffffff000009cb R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffffff815e2cfe R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88806a494120 R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88802cc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b2de21000 CR3: 000000005ad59000 CR4: 0000000000150ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> page_counter_uncharge+0x2e/0x60 mm/page_counter.c:160 drain_stock+0xc1/0x180 mm/memcontrol.c:2219 refill_stock+0x139/0x2f0 mm/memcontrol.c:2271 __sk_mem_reduce_allocated+0x24d/0x550 net/core/sock.c:2945 __mptcp_rmem_reclaim net/mptcp/protocol.c:167 [inline] __mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial+0x124/0x410 net/mptcp/protocol.c:975 mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial net/mptcp/protocol.c:982 [inline] mptcp_alloc_tx_skb net/mptcp/protocol.c:1212 [inline] mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x18c6/0x2190 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1279 __mptcp_push_pending+0x232/0x720 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1545 mptcp_release_cb+0xfe/0x200 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2975 release_sock+0xb4/0x1b0 net/core/sock.c:3306 mptcp_worker+0x51e/0xc10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2443 process_one_work+0x9b2/0x1690 kernel/workqueue.c:2298 worker_thread+0x658/0x11f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2445 kthread+0x405/0x4f0 kernel/kthread.c:327 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 </TASK> __mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial() could call __mptcp_rmem_reclaim() with a negative value, which passed that negative value to __sk_mem_reduce_allocated() and triggered the splat above. Check for a reclaim amount that is positive and large enough for __mptcp_rmem_reclaim() to actually adjust rmem_fwd_alloc (much like the sk_mem_reclaim_partial() code the function is based on). v2: Use '>' instead of '>=', since SK_MEM_QUANTUM - 1 would get right-shifted into nothing by __mptcp_rmem_reclaim. Fixes: 6511882 ("mptcp: allocate fwd memory separately on the rx and tx path") Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#252 Cc: [email protected] Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>

syzbot found a page counter underflow that was triggered by MPTCP's reclaim code: page_counter underflow: -4294964789 nr_pages=4294967295 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3785 at mm/page_counter.c:56 page_counter_cancel+0xcf/0xe0 mm/page_counter.c:56 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 3785 Comm: kworker/2:6 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events mptcp_worker RIP: 0010:page_counter_cancel+0xcf/0xe0 mm/page_counter.c:56 Code: c7 04 24 00 00 00 00 45 31 f6 eb 97 e8 2a 2b b5 ff 4c 89 ea 48 89 ee 48 c7 c7 00 9e b8 89 c6 05 a0 c1 ba 0b 01 e8 95 e4 4b 07 <0f> 0b eb a8 4c 89 e7 e8 25 5a fb ff eb c7 0f 1f 00 41 56 41 55 49 RSP: 0018:ffffc90002d4f918 EFLAGS: 00010082 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88806a494120 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff8880688c41c0 RSI: ffffffff815e8f28 RDI: fffff520005a9f15 RBP: ffffffff000009cb R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffffff815e2cfe R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88806a494120 R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88802cc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b2de21000 CR3: 000000005ad59000 CR4: 0000000000150ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> page_counter_uncharge+0x2e/0x60 mm/page_counter.c:160 drain_stock+0xc1/0x180 mm/memcontrol.c:2219 refill_stock+0x139/0x2f0 mm/memcontrol.c:2271 __sk_mem_reduce_allocated+0x24d/0x550 net/core/sock.c:2945 __mptcp_rmem_reclaim net/mptcp/protocol.c:167 [inline] __mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial+0x124/0x410 net/mptcp/protocol.c:975 mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial net/mptcp/protocol.c:982 [inline] mptcp_alloc_tx_skb net/mptcp/protocol.c:1212 [inline] mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x18c6/0x2190 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1279 __mptcp_push_pending+0x232/0x720 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1545 mptcp_release_cb+0xfe/0x200 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2975 release_sock+0xb4/0x1b0 net/core/sock.c:3306 mptcp_worker+0x51e/0xc10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2443 process_one_work+0x9b2/0x1690 kernel/workqueue.c:2298 worker_thread+0x658/0x11f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2445 kthread+0x405/0x4f0 kernel/kthread.c:327 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 </TASK> __mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial() could call __mptcp_rmem_reclaim() with a negative value, which passed that negative value to __sk_mem_reduce_allocated() and triggered the splat above. Check for a reclaim amount that is positive and large enough for __mptcp_rmem_reclaim() to actually adjust rmem_fwd_alloc (much like the sk_mem_reclaim_partial() code the function is based on). v2: Use '>' instead of '>=', since SK_MEM_QUANTUM - 1 would get right-shifted into nothing by __mptcp_rmem_reclaim. Fixes: 6511882 ("mptcp: allocate fwd memory separately on the rx and tx path") Closes: #252 Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected] Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>

syzbot found a page counter underflow that was triggered by MPTCP's reclaim code: page_counter underflow: -4294964789 nr_pages=4294967295 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3785 at mm/page_counter.c:56 page_counter_cancel+0xcf/0xe0 mm/page_counter.c:56 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 3785 Comm: kworker/2:6 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events mptcp_worker RIP: 0010:page_counter_cancel+0xcf/0xe0 mm/page_counter.c:56 Code: c7 04 24 00 00 00 00 45 31 f6 eb 97 e8 2a 2b b5 ff 4c 89 ea 48 89 ee 48 c7 c7 00 9e b8 89 c6 05 a0 c1 ba 0b 01 e8 95 e4 4b 07 <0f> 0b eb a8 4c 89 e7 e8 25 5a fb ff eb c7 0f 1f 00 41 56 41 55 49 RSP: 0018:ffffc90002d4f918 EFLAGS: 00010082 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88806a494120 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff8880688c41c0 RSI: ffffffff815e8f28 RDI: fffff520005a9f15 RBP: ffffffff000009cb R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffffff815e2cfe R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88806a494120 R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88802cc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b2de21000 CR3: 000000005ad59000 CR4: 0000000000150ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> page_counter_uncharge+0x2e/0x60 mm/page_counter.c:160 drain_stock+0xc1/0x180 mm/memcontrol.c:2219 refill_stock+0x139/0x2f0 mm/memcontrol.c:2271 __sk_mem_reduce_allocated+0x24d/0x550 net/core/sock.c:2945 __mptcp_rmem_reclaim net/mptcp/protocol.c:167 [inline] __mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial+0x124/0x410 net/mptcp/protocol.c:975 mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial net/mptcp/protocol.c:982 [inline] mptcp_alloc_tx_skb net/mptcp/protocol.c:1212 [inline] mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x18c6/0x2190 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1279 __mptcp_push_pending+0x232/0x720 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1545 mptcp_release_cb+0xfe/0x200 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2975 release_sock+0xb4/0x1b0 net/core/sock.c:3306 mptcp_worker+0x51e/0xc10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2443 process_one_work+0x9b2/0x1690 kernel/workqueue.c:2298 worker_thread+0x658/0x11f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2445 kthread+0x405/0x4f0 kernel/kthread.c:327 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 </TASK> __mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial() could call __mptcp_rmem_reclaim() with a negative value, which passed that negative value to __sk_mem_reduce_allocated() and triggered the splat above. Check for a reclaim amount that is positive and large enough for __mptcp_rmem_reclaim() to actually adjust rmem_fwd_alloc (much like the sk_mem_reclaim_partial() code the function is based on). v2: Use '>' instead of '>=', since SK_MEM_QUANTUM - 1 would get right-shifted into nothing by __mptcp_rmem_reclaim. Fixes: 6511882 ("mptcp: allocate fwd memory separately on the rx and tx path") Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#252 Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected] Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>

syzbot found a page counter underflow that was triggered by MPTCP's reclaim code: page_counter underflow: -4294964789 nr_pages=4294967295 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3785 at mm/page_counter.c:56 page_counter_cancel+0xcf/0xe0 mm/page_counter.c:56 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 3785 Comm: kworker/2:6 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events mptcp_worker RIP: 0010:page_counter_cancel+0xcf/0xe0 mm/page_counter.c:56 Code: c7 04 24 00 00 00 00 45 31 f6 eb 97 e8 2a 2b b5 ff 4c 89 ea 48 89 ee 48 c7 c7 00 9e b8 89 c6 05 a0 c1 ba 0b 01 e8 95 e4 4b 07 <0f> 0b eb a8 4c 89 e7 e8 25 5a fb ff eb c7 0f 1f 00 41 56 41 55 49 RSP: 0018:ffffc90002d4f918 EFLAGS: 00010082 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88806a494120 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff8880688c41c0 RSI: ffffffff815e8f28 RDI: fffff520005a9f15 RBP: ffffffff000009cb R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffffff815e2cfe R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88806a494120 R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88802cc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b2de21000 CR3: 000000005ad59000 CR4: 0000000000150ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> page_counter_uncharge+0x2e/0x60 mm/page_counter.c:160 drain_stock+0xc1/0x180 mm/memcontrol.c:2219 refill_stock+0x139/0x2f0 mm/memcontrol.c:2271 __sk_mem_reduce_allocated+0x24d/0x550 net/core/sock.c:2945 __mptcp_rmem_reclaim net/mptcp/protocol.c:167 [inline] __mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial+0x124/0x410 net/mptcp/protocol.c:975 mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial net/mptcp/protocol.c:982 [inline] mptcp_alloc_tx_skb net/mptcp/protocol.c:1212 [inline] mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x18c6/0x2190 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1279 __mptcp_push_pending+0x232/0x720 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1545 mptcp_release_cb+0xfe/0x200 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2975 release_sock+0xb4/0x1b0 net/core/sock.c:3306 mptcp_worker+0x51e/0xc10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2443 process_one_work+0x9b2/0x1690 kernel/workqueue.c:2298 worker_thread+0x658/0x11f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2445 kthread+0x405/0x4f0 kernel/kthread.c:327 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 </TASK> __mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial() could call __mptcp_rmem_reclaim() with a negative value, which passed that negative value to __sk_mem_reduce_allocated() and triggered the splat above. Check for a reclaim amount that is positive and large enough for __mptcp_rmem_reclaim() to actually adjust rmem_fwd_alloc (much like the sk_mem_reclaim_partial() code the function is based on). v2: Use '>' instead of '>=', since SK_MEM_QUANTUM - 1 would get right-shifted into nothing by __mptcp_rmem_reclaim. Fixes: 6511882 ("mptcp: allocate fwd memory separately on the rx and tx path") Closes: #252 Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected] Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 269bda9 ] syzbot found a page counter underflow that was triggered by MPTCP's reclaim code: page_counter underflow: -4294964789 nr_pages=4294967295 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3785 at mm/page_counter.c:56 page_counter_cancel+0xcf/0xe0 mm/page_counter.c:56 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 3785 Comm: kworker/2:6 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events mptcp_worker RIP: 0010:page_counter_cancel+0xcf/0xe0 mm/page_counter.c:56 Code: c7 04 24 00 00 00 00 45 31 f6 eb 97 e8 2a 2b b5 ff 4c 89 ea 48 89 ee 48 c7 c7 00 9e b8 89 c6 05 a0 c1 ba 0b 01 e8 95 e4 4b 07 <0f> 0b eb a8 4c 89 e7 e8 25 5a fb ff eb c7 0f 1f 00 41 56 41 55 49 RSP: 0018:ffffc90002d4f918 EFLAGS: 00010082 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88806a494120 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff8880688c41c0 RSI: ffffffff815e8f28 RDI: fffff520005a9f15 RBP: ffffffff000009cb R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffffff815e2cfe R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88806a494120 R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88802cc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b2de21000 CR3: 000000005ad59000 CR4: 0000000000150ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> page_counter_uncharge+0x2e/0x60 mm/page_counter.c:160 drain_stock+0xc1/0x180 mm/memcontrol.c:2219 refill_stock+0x139/0x2f0 mm/memcontrol.c:2271 __sk_mem_reduce_allocated+0x24d/0x550 net/core/sock.c:2945 __mptcp_rmem_reclaim net/mptcp/protocol.c:167 [inline] __mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial+0x124/0x410 net/mptcp/protocol.c:975 mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial net/mptcp/protocol.c:982 [inline] mptcp_alloc_tx_skb net/mptcp/protocol.c:1212 [inline] mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x18c6/0x2190 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1279 __mptcp_push_pending+0x232/0x720 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1545 mptcp_release_cb+0xfe/0x200 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2975 release_sock+0xb4/0x1b0 net/core/sock.c:3306 mptcp_worker+0x51e/0xc10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2443 process_one_work+0x9b2/0x1690 kernel/workqueue.c:2298 worker_thread+0x658/0x11f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2445 kthread+0x405/0x4f0 kernel/kthread.c:327 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 </TASK> __mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial() could call __mptcp_rmem_reclaim() with a negative value, which passed that negative value to __sk_mem_reduce_allocated() and triggered the splat above. Check for a reclaim amount that is positive and large enough for __mptcp_rmem_reclaim() to actually adjust rmem_fwd_alloc (much like the sk_mem_reclaim_partial() code the function is based on). v2: Use '>' instead of '>=', since SK_MEM_QUANTUM - 1 would get right-shifted into nothing by __mptcp_rmem_reclaim. Fixes: 6511882 ("mptcp: allocate fwd memory separately on the rx and tx path") Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#252 Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected] Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts attach, detach and query API: # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts [...] #238 tc_opts_after:OK #239 tc_opts_append:OK #240 tc_opts_basic:OK #241 tc_opts_before:OK #242 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #243 tc_opts_demixed:OK #244 tc_opts_detach:OK #245 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #246 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #247 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #248 tc_opts_invalid:OK #249 tc_opts_mixed:OK #250 tc_opts_prepend:OK #251 tc_opts_replace:OK #252 tc_opts_revision:OK Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>

Add a detachment test case with miniq present to assert that with and without the miniq we get the same error. # ./test_progs -t tc_opts #244 tc_opts_after:OK #245 tc_opts_append:OK #246 tc_opts_basic:OK #247 tc_opts_before:OK #248 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #249 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK #250 tc_opts_demixed:OK #251 tc_opts_detach:OK #252 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #253 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #254 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #255 tc_opts_invalid:OK #256 tc_opts_mixed:OK #257 tc_opts_prepend:OK #258 tc_opts_replace:OK #259 tc_opts_revision:OK Summary: 16/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>

Add several new tcx test cases to improve test coverage. This also includes a few new tests with ingress instead of clsact qdisc, to cover the fix from commit dc644b5 ("tcx: Fix splat in ingress_destroy upon tcx_entry_free"). # ./test_progs -t tc [...] #234 tc_links_after:OK #235 tc_links_append:OK #236 tc_links_basic:OK #237 tc_links_before:OK #238 tc_links_chain_classic:OK #239 tc_links_chain_mixed:OK #240 tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK #241 tc_links_dev_mixed:OK #242 tc_links_ingress:OK #243 tc_links_invalid:OK #244 tc_links_prepend:OK #245 tc_links_replace:OK #246 tc_links_revision:OK #247 tc_opts_after:OK #248 tc_opts_append:OK #249 tc_opts_basic:OK #250 tc_opts_before:OK #251 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #252 tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK #253 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK #254 tc_opts_demixed:OK #255 tc_opts_detach:OK #256 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #257 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #258 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #259 tc_opts_invalid:OK #260 tc_opts_mixed:OK #261 tc_opts_prepend:OK #262 tc_opts_replace:OK #263 tc_opts_revision:OK [...] Summary: 44/38 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8699efc284b75ccdc51ddf7062fa2370330dc6c0.1692029283.git.daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>

Add various tests to check maximum number of supported programs being attached: # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts [...] ./test_progs -t tc_opts [ 1.185325] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 1.186826] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel [ 1.270123] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.988 MHz [ 1.272428] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fc932722, max_idle_ns: 440795381586 ns [ 1.276408] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc #252 tc_opts_after:OK #253 tc_opts_append:OK #254 tc_opts_basic:OK #255 tc_opts_before:OK #256 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #257 tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK #258 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK #259 tc_opts_demixed:OK #260 tc_opts_detach:OK #261 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #262 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #263 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #264 tc_opts_invalid:OK #265 tc_opts_max:OK <--- (new test) #266 tc_opts_mixed:OK #267 tc_opts_prepend:OK #268 tc_opts_replace:OK #269 tc_opts_revision:OK Summary: 18/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]

Add a new test case which performs double query of the bpf_mprog through libbpf API, but also via raw bpf(2) syscall. This is testing to gather first the count and then in a subsequent probe the full information with the program array without clearing passed structs in between. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts [...] ./test_progs -t tc_opts [ 1.398818] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.999 MHz [ 1.400263] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fd336761, max_idle_ns: 440795243819 ns [ 1.402734] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc [ 1.426639] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 1.428112] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel #252 tc_opts_after:OK #253 tc_opts_append:OK #254 tc_opts_basic:OK #255 tc_opts_before:OK #256 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #257 tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK #258 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK #259 tc_opts_demixed:OK #260 tc_opts_detach:OK #261 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #262 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #263 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #264 tc_opts_invalid:OK #265 tc_opts_max:OK #266 tc_opts_mixed:OK #267 tc_opts_prepend:OK #268 tc_opts_query:OK <--- (new test) #269 tc_opts_replace:OK #270 tc_opts_revision:OK Summary: 19/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>

Add a new test case to query on an empty bpf_mprog and pass the revision directly into expected_revision for attachment to assert that this does succeed. ./test_progs -t tc_opts [ 1.406778] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.990 MHz [ 1.408863] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fcaf6eb0, max_idle_ns: 440795321766 ns [ 1.412419] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc [ 1.428671] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 1.430260] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel #252 tc_opts_after:OK #253 tc_opts_append:OK #254 tc_opts_basic:OK #255 tc_opts_before:OK #256 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #257 tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK #258 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK #259 tc_opts_demixed:OK #260 tc_opts_detach:OK #261 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #262 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #263 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #264 tc_opts_invalid:OK #265 tc_opts_max:OK #266 tc_opts_mixed:OK #267 tc_opts_prepend:OK #268 tc_opts_query:OK #269 tc_opts_query_attach:OK <--- (new test) #270 tc_opts_replace:OK #271 tc_opts_revision:OK Summary: 20/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>

Add several new test cases which assert corner cases on the mprog query mechanism, for example, around passing in a too small or a larger array than the current count. ./test_progs -t tc_opts #252 tc_opts_after:OK #253 tc_opts_append:OK #254 tc_opts_basic:OK #255 tc_opts_before:OK #256 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #257 tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK #258 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK #259 tc_opts_demixed:OK #260 tc_opts_detach:OK #261 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #262 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #263 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #264 tc_opts_invalid:OK #265 tc_opts_max:OK #266 tc_opts_mixed:OK #267 tc_opts_prepend:OK #268 tc_opts_query:OK #269 tc_opts_query_attach:OK #270 tc_opts_replace:OK #271 tc_opts_revision:OK Summary: 20/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]

mjmartineau self-assigned this Jan 5, 2022

mjmartineau added bug syzkaller labels Jan 5, 2022

matttbe closed this as completed in 7962b6a Jan 6, 2022

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[syzkaller] WARNING in page_counter_cancel #252

[syzkaller] WARNING in page_counter_cancel #252

mjmartineau commented Jan 5, 2022 •

edited

Loading

[syzkaller] WARNING in page_counter_cancel #252

[syzkaller] WARNING in page_counter_cancel #252

Comments

mjmartineau commented Jan 5, 2022 • edited Loading

mjmartineau commented Jan 5, 2022 •

edited

Loading