Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deadlock in mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() #244

Closed
darkwrat opened this issue Nov 30, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Deadlock in mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() #244

darkwrat opened this issue Nov 30, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@darkwrat
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like __mptcp_push_pending can call mptcp_sockopt_sync_all through mptcp_flush_join_list while holding the subflow socket lock. Then, __mptcp_sockopt_sync tries to lock the subflow socket for itself, hence the deadlock.

Could you please advise me on a proper fix if I got the root cause correctly? Should I work on a way to reproduce the issue?

I believe that cork/nodelay patches have provided an easy-ish way for me to hit that by not doing subflow->setsockopt_seq = msk->setsockopt_seq before releasing the subflow socket lock. Does this deserve an improvement?

I don't expect line numbers to match any hash, sorry about that. This is from a cloud VM, where I use rebuilt fedora RPMs with patches applied.

[318974.491932] sysrq: Show Blocked State
[318974.494171] task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
[318974.497599] Call Trace:
[318974.498836]  <TASK>
[318974.500244] __schedule (kernel/sched/core.c:4972 kernel/sched/core.c:6253) 
[318974.501917] ? __mod_memcg_state (mm/memcontrol.c:635 mm/memcontrol.c:675 mm/memcontrol.c:669) 
[318974.503458] ? csum_partial (./arch/x86/include/asm/checksum_64.h:171 arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c:136) 
[318974.504894] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave (./arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:202 ./include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:513 ./include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:82 ./include/linux/spinlock.h:185 ./include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:111 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162) 
[318974.506631] schedule (kernel/sched/core.c:6327 (discriminator 1)) 
[318974.508030] __lock_sock (./include/linux/spinlock.h:354 net/core/sock.c:2747) 
[318974.509664] ? do_wait_intr_irq (kernel/sched/wait.c:408) 
[318974.511439] __lock_sock_fast (./include/linux/spinlock.h:394 net/core/sock.c:3344) 
[318974.513068] mptcp_sockopt_sync_all (net/mptcp/sockopt.c:1247 net/mptcp/sockopt.c:1278) 
[318974.514965] __mptcp_push_pending (net/mptcp/protocol.c:1572) 
[318974.516598] mptcp_sendmsg (net/mptcp/protocol.c:1795) 
[318974.518534] sock_sendmsg (net/socket.c:704 net/socket.c:724) 
[318974.519930] __sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2036) 
[318974.521319] ? do_wait_intr_irq (kernel/sched/wait.c:408) 
[318974.522694] ? fpregs_restore_userregs (arch/x86/kernel/fpu/context.h:60) 
[318974.524201] __x64_sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2048 net/socket.c:2044 net/socket.c:2044) 
[318974.525479] do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80) 
[318974.526565] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:113) 
[318974.528085] RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
[318974.529277] RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
[318974.531374] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
[318974.533451] RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
[318974.535692] RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[318974.537988] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
[318974.540142] R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
[318974.543063]  </TASK>
@fw-strlen
Copy link

I'd switch to __mptcp_push_pending() to __mptcp_flush_join_list().

@pabeni
Copy link

pabeni commented Dec 1, 2021 via email

@darkwrat
Copy link
Contributor Author

darkwrat commented Dec 1, 2021

I'd switch to __mptcp_push_pending() to __mptcp_flush_join_list().

Hi Florian, thank you for the suggestion, I've done just that and sent a patch to the list.

fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
@matttbe matttbe added the bug label Dec 2, 2021
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
@matttbe matttbe closed this as completed in 53be719 Dec 2, 2021
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 4, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 7, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 7, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 7, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 10, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 11, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 14, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 14, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this issue Dec 14, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 15, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 15, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 15, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2021
__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: #244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 19, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 19, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
imaami pushed a commit to imaami/linux that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 22, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 22, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 22, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 22, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Dec 22, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
tuxedo-bot pushed a commit to tuxedocomputers/linux that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2022
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958287

[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <[email protected]>
tuxedo-bot pushed a commit to tuxedocomputers/linux that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2022
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958287

[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <[email protected]>
nvidia-bfigg pushed a commit to NVIDIA-BaseOS-6/linux-nvidia-5.19 that referenced this issue Nov 15, 2022
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956302

[ Upstream commit 3d79e37 ]

__mptcp_push_pending() may call mptcp_flush_join_list() with subflow
socket lock held. If such call hits mptcp_sockopt_sync_all() then
subsequently __mptcp_sockopt_sync() could try to lock the subflow
socket for itself, causing a deadlock.

sysrq: Show Blocked State
task:ss-server       state:D stack:    0 pid:  938 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000000
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __schedule+0x2d6/0x10c0
 ? __mod_memcg_state+0x4d/0x70
 ? csum_partial+0xd/0x20
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x50
 schedule+0x4e/0xc0
 __lock_sock+0x69/0x90
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 __lock_sock_fast+0x35/0x50
 mptcp_sockopt_sync_all+0x38/0xc0
 __mptcp_push_pending+0x105/0x200
 mptcp_sendmsg+0x466/0x490
 sock_sendmsg+0x57/0x60
 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160
 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xa0/0xa0
 ? fpregs_restore_userregs+0x12/0xd0
 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f9ba546c2d0
RSP: 002b:00007ffdc3b762d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9ba56c8060 RCX: 00007f9ba546c2d0
RDX: 000000000000077a RSI: 0000000000e5e180 RDI: 0000000000000234
RBP: 0000000000cc57f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9ba56c8060
R13: 0000000000b6ba60 R14: 0000000000cc7840 R15: 41d8685b1d7901b8
 </TASK>

Fix the issue by using __mptcp_flush_join_list() instead of plain
mptcp_flush_join_list() inside __mptcp_push_pending(), as suggested by
Florian. The sockopt sync will be deferred to the workqueue.

Fixes: 1b3e7ed ("mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#244
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 20, 2023
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #238     tc_opts_after:OK
  #239     tc_opts_append:OK
  #240     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #241     tc_opts_before:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #249     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #250     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #251     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #252     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2023
Add a detachment test case with miniq present to assert that with and
without the miniq we get the same error.

  # ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  #244     tc_opts_after:OK
  #245     tc_opts_append:OK
  #246     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #247     tc_opts_before:OK
  #248     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #249     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #250     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #251     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #252     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #253     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #254     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #255     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #256     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #257     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #258     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #259     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 16/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 17, 2023
Add several new tcx test cases to improve test coverage. This also includes
a few new tests with ingress instead of clsact qdisc, to cover the fix from
commit dc644b5 ("tcx: Fix splat in ingress_destroy upon tcx_entry_free").

  # ./test_progs -t tc
  [...]
  #234     tc_links_after:OK
  #235     tc_links_append:OK
  #236     tc_links_basic:OK
  #237     tc_links_before:OK
  #238     tc_links_chain_classic:OK
  #239     tc_links_chain_mixed:OK
  #240     tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK
  #241     tc_links_dev_mixed:OK
  #242     tc_links_ingress:OK
  #243     tc_links_invalid:OK
  #244     tc_links_prepend:OK
  #245     tc_links_replace:OK
  #246     tc_links_revision:OK
  #247     tc_opts_after:OK
  #248     tc_opts_append:OK
  #249     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #250     tc_opts_before:OK
  #251     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #252     tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK
  #253     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #254     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #255     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #256     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #257     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #258     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #259     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #260     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #261     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #262     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #263     tc_opts_revision:OK
  [...]
  Summary: 44/38 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8699efc284b75ccdc51ddf7062fa2370330dc6c0.1692029283.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants