kmemleak: suspected mem leak in msr_build_context() #268

matttbe · 2022-04-21T14:08:30Z

The CI reports this issues and it can reproduce it all the time:

unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256):
comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ........H.......
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
backtrace:
msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) 
pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) 
do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) 
kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) 
kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) 
ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304)

After investigation on my side, git bisect reports the issue has been introduced by e2a1256 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume"). Reverting this commit indeed helps.

It looks like a false positive: an array is allocated but never freed. It doesn't need to be freed in fact and it is still attached to a static variable so no need to worry about it. The origin of the issue is then 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume").

Just strange I cannot find other reports elsewhere. Just a few mentions but no fixes: https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/1/11/116 & https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg2164453.html

Maybe only visible because of our kconfig (mainly: x86_64_defconfig + virt + debug (- slab_debug) + mptcp)?

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Since commit e2a1256 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume"), kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) It is easy to reproduce it on my side: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config [1] - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan It seems kmemleak has an issue with the array allocated in msr_build_context() and assigned to a pointer in a static structure (saved_context.saved_msrs->array): there is no leak then. It looks like this is a limitation from kmemleak but that's alright, kmemleak_no_leak() can be used to avoid complaining about that. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ But on my side, msr_build_context() is only used since: commit e2a1256 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume"). Depending on their CPUs, others have probably the same issue since: commit 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume"), hence the 'Fixes' tag here below to help with the backports. But I understand if someone says the origin of this issue is more on kmemleak's side. What is unclear to me is why this issue was not seen by other people and CIs. Maybe the kernel config [1]? [1] https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/files/8531660/kmemleak-cpu-sched-bisect.kconfig.txt Fixes: 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Closes: #268 Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]>

matttbe · 2022-04-22T15:08:59Z

Regarding the final patch, after the analysis from @mjmartineau and the confirmation from one maintainer, a different approach is going to be taken:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/[email protected]/

New proposed patch:

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_32.h
index 7b132d0312eb..a800abb1a992 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_32.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_32.h
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ struct saved_context {
        u16 gs;
        unsigned long cr0, cr2, cr3, cr4;
        u64 misc_enable;
-       bool misc_enable_saved;
        struct saved_msrs saved_msrs;
        struct desc_ptr gdt_desc;
        struct desc_ptr idt;
@@ -28,6 +27,7 @@ struct saved_context {
        unsigned long tr;
        unsigned long safety;
        unsigned long return_address;
+       bool misc_enable_saved;
 } __attribute__((packed));
 
 /* routines for saving/restoring kernel state */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_64.h
index 35bb35d28733..24e84ccd3825 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_64.h
@@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ struct saved_context {
 
        unsigned long cr0, cr2, cr3, cr4;
        u64 misc_enable;
-       bool misc_enable_saved;
        struct saved_msrs saved_msrs;
        unsigned long efer;
        u16 gdt_pad; /* Unused */
@@ -48,6 +47,7 @@ struct saved_context {
        unsigned long tr;
        unsigned long safety;
        unsigned long return_address;
+       bool misc_enable_saved;
 } __attribute__((packed));
 
 #define loaddebug(thread,register) \

Since commit e2a1256 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume"), kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) It is easy to reproduce it on my side: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config [1] - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan It seems kmemleak has an issue with the array allocated in msr_build_context() and assigned to a pointer in a static structure (saved_context.saved_msrs->array): there is no leak then. It looks like this is a limitation from kmemleak but that's alright, kmemleak_no_leak() can be used to avoid complaining about that. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ But on my side, msr_build_context() is only used since: commit e2a1256 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume"). Depending on their CPUs, others have probably the same issue since: commit 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume"), hence the 'Fixes' tag here below to help with the backports. But I understand if someone says the origin of this issue is more on kmemleak's side. What is unclear to me is why this issue was not seen by other people and CIs. Maybe the kernel config [1]? [1] https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/files/8531660/kmemleak-cpu-sched-bisect.kconfig.txt Fixes: 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Closes: #268 Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]>

Since commit e2a1256 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume"), kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) It is easy to reproduce it on my side: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see the 'Closes:' tag) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan It seems kmemleak has an issue with the array allocated in msr_build_context(). This array is assigned to a pointer in a static structure (saved_context.saved_msrs->array): there is no leak then. A simple fix for this issue would be to use kmemleak_no_leak() but Mat noticed that the root cause here is alignment within the packed 'struct saved_context' (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ u16 es; /* 170 2 */ u16 fs; /* 172 2 */ u16 gs; /* 174 2 */ long unsigned int kernelmode_gs_base; /* 176 8 */ long unsigned int usermode_gs_base; /* 184 8 */ /* --- cacheline 3 boundary (192 bytes) --- */ long unsigned int fs_base; /* 192 8 */ long unsigned int cr0; /* 200 8 */ long unsigned int cr2; /* 208 8 */ long unsigned int cr3; /* 216 8 */ long unsigned int cr4; /* 224 8 */ u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); By moving 'misc_enable_saved' to the end of the struct declaration, 'saved_msrs' fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary and the kmemleak warning goes away. The comment above the 'saved_context' declaration says to check wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like it's the members before 'misc_enable' that must be carefully placed. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but that's always good to avoid unaligned member for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ But on my side, msr_build_context() is only used since: commit e2a1256 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume"). Others probably have the same issue since: commit 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume"), Hence the 'Fixes' tag here below to help with the backports. Fixes: 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Closes: #268 Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]>

Since e2a1256 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) Reproducer: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#268) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan The root cause here is alignment within the packed struct saved_context (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ ... u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); Move misc_enable_saved to the end of the struct declaration so that saved_msrs fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary. The comment above the saved_context declaration says to fix wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through offsets which are computed at build-time. Update that comment accordingly. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but it is always good to avoid unaligned members for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [ bp: Massage + cleanup commit message. ] Fixes: 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Since e2a1256 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) Reproducer: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see #268) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan The root cause here is alignment within the packed struct saved_context (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ ... u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); Move misc_enable_saved to the end of the struct declaration so that saved_msrs fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary. The comment above the saved_context declaration says to fix wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through offsets which are computed at build-time. Update that comment accordingly. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but it is always good to avoid unaligned members for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [ bp: Massage + cleanup commit message. ] Fixes: 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]>

Since e2a1256 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) Reproducer: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see #268) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan The root cause here is alignment within the packed struct saved_context (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ ... u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); Move misc_enable_saved to the end of the struct declaration so that saved_msrs fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary. The comment above the saved_context declaration says to fix wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through offsets which are computed at build-time. Update that comment accordingly. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but it is always good to avoid unaligned members for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [ bp: Massage + cleanup commit message. ] Fixes: 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

[ Upstream commit b0b592cf08367719e1d1ef07c9f136e8c17f7ec3 ] Since e2a1256b17b1 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) Reproducer: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#268) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan The root cause here is alignment within the packed struct saved_context (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ ... u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); Move misc_enable_saved to the end of the struct declaration so that saved_msrs fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary. The comment above the saved_context declaration says to fix wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through offsets which are computed at build-time. Update that comment accordingly. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but it is always good to avoid unaligned members for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [ bp: Massage + cleanup commit message. ] Fixes: 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit b0b592cf08367719e1d1ef07c9f136e8c17f7ec3 ] Since e2a1256b17b1 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) Reproducer: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#268) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan The root cause here is alignment within the packed struct saved_context (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ ... u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); Move misc_enable_saved to the end of the struct declaration so that saved_msrs fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary. The comment above the saved_context declaration says to fix wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through offsets which are computed at build-time. Update that comment accordingly. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but it is always good to avoid unaligned members for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [ bp: Massage + cleanup commit message. ] Fixes: 7a9c2dd08ead ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit b0b592cf08367719e1d1ef07c9f136e8c17f7ec3 ] Since e2a1256b17b1 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) Reproducer: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#268) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan The root cause here is alignment within the packed struct saved_context (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ ... u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); Move misc_enable_saved to the end of the struct declaration so that saved_msrs fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary. The comment above the saved_context declaration says to fix wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through offsets which are computed at build-time. Update that comment accordingly. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but it is always good to avoid unaligned members for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [ bp: Massage + cleanup commit message. ] Fixes: 7a9c2dd08ead ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Santhosh <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit b0b592cf08367719e1d1ef07c9f136e8c17f7ec3 ] Since e2a1256b17b1 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) Reproducer: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#268) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan The root cause here is alignment within the packed struct saved_context (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ ... u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); Move misc_enable_saved to the end of the struct declaration so that saved_msrs fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary. The comment above the saved_context declaration says to fix wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through offsets which are computed at build-time. Update that comment accordingly. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but it is always good to avoid unaligned members for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [ bp: Massage + cleanup commit message. ] Fixes: 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit b0b592cf08367719e1d1ef07c9f136e8c17f7ec3 ] Since e2a1256b17b1 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) Reproducer: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#268) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan The root cause here is alignment within the packed struct saved_context (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ ... u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); Move misc_enable_saved to the end of the struct declaration so that saved_msrs fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary. The comment above the saved_context declaration says to fix wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through offsets which are computed at build-time. Update that comment accordingly. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but it is always good to avoid unaligned members for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [ bp: Massage + cleanup commit message. ] Fixes: 7a9c2dd08ead ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit b0b592c ] Since e2a1256 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) Reproducer: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#268) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan The root cause here is alignment within the packed struct saved_context (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ ... u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); Move misc_enable_saved to the end of the struct declaration so that saved_msrs fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary. The comment above the saved_context declaration says to fix wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through offsets which are computed at build-time. Update that comment accordingly. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but it is always good to avoid unaligned members for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [ bp: Massage + cleanup commit message. ] Fixes: 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit b0b592cf08367719e1d1ef07c9f136e8c17f7ec3 ] Since e2a1256b17b1 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) Reproducer: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#268) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan The root cause here is alignment within the packed struct saved_context (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ ... u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); Move misc_enable_saved to the end of the struct declaration so that saved_msrs fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary. The comment above the saved_context declaration says to fix wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through offsets which are computed at build-time. Update that comment accordingly. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but it is always good to avoid unaligned members for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [ bp: Massage + cleanup commit message. ] Fixes: 7a9c2dd08ead ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Santhosh <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit b0b592cf08367719e1d1ef07c9f136e8c17f7ec3 ] Since e2a1256b17b1 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) Reproducer: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#268) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan The root cause here is alignment within the packed struct saved_context (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ ... u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); Move misc_enable_saved to the end of the struct declaration so that saved_msrs fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary. The comment above the saved_context declaration says to fix wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through offsets which are computed at build-time. Update that comment accordingly. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but it is always good to avoid unaligned members for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [ bp: Massage + cleanup commit message. ] Fixes: 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

jira LE-1907 cve CVE-2023-1637 Rebuild_History Non-Buildable kernel-5.14.0-284.30.1.el9_2 commit-author Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> commit b0b592c Since e2a1256 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) Reproducer: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#268) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan The root cause here is alignment within the packed struct saved_context (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ ... u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); Move misc_enable_saved to the end of the struct declaration so that saved_msrs fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary. The comment above the saved_context declaration says to fix wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through offsets which are computed at build-time. Update that comment accordingly. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but it is always good to avoid unaligned members for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [ bp: Massage + cleanup commit message. ] Fixes: 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] (cherry picked from commit b0b592c) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Maple <[email protected]>

jira LE-1907 cve CVE-2023-1637 Rebuild_History Non-Buildable kernel-rt-5.14.0-284.30.1.rt14.315.el9_2 commit-author Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> commit b0b592c Since e2a1256 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) Reproducer: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#268) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan The root cause here is alignment within the packed struct saved_context (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ ... u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); Move misc_enable_saved to the end of the struct declaration so that saved_msrs fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary. The comment above the saved_context declaration says to fix wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through offsets which are computed at build-time. Update that comment accordingly. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but it is always good to avoid unaligned members for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [ bp: Massage + cleanup commit message. ] Fixes: 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] (cherry picked from commit b0b592c) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Maple <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit b0b592cf08367719e1d1ef07c9f136e8c17f7ec3 ] Since e2a1256b17b1 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) Reproducer: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#268) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan The root cause here is alignment within the packed struct saved_context (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ ... u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); Move misc_enable_saved to the end of the struct declaration so that saved_msrs fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary. The comment above the saved_context declaration says to fix wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through offsets which are computed at build-time. Update that comment accordingly. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but it is always good to avoid unaligned members for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [ bp: Massage + cleanup commit message. ] Fixes: 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit b0b592cf08367719e1d1ef07c9f136e8c17f7ec3 ] Since e2a1256b17b1 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) Reproducer: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#268) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan The root cause here is alignment within the packed struct saved_context (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ ... u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); Move misc_enable_saved to the end of the struct declaration so that saved_msrs fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary. The comment above the saved_context declaration says to fix wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through offsets which are computed at build-time. Update that comment accordingly. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but it is always good to avoid unaligned members for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [ bp: Massage + cleanup commit message. ] Fixes: 7a9c2dd08ead ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Santhosh <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit b0b592cf08367719e1d1ef07c9f136e8c17f7ec3 ] Since e2a1256b17b1 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") kmemleak reports this issue: unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........H....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621) pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520) do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298) kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370) kernel_init (init/main.c:1504) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304) Reproducer: - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#268) - wait ~1 minute - start a kmemleak scan The root cause here is alignment within the packed struct saved_context (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it in the structure are unaligned: struct saved_context { struct pt_regs regs; /* 0 168 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u16 ds; /* 168 2 */ ... u64 misc_enable; /* 232 8 */ bool misc_enable_saved; /* 240 1 */ /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */ struct saved_msrs saved_msrs; /* 241 16 */ /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */ long unsigned int efer; /* 257 8 */ u16 gdt_pad; /* 265 2 */ struct desc_ptr gdt_desc; /* 267 10 */ u16 idt_pad; /* 277 2 */ struct desc_ptr idt; /* 279 10 */ u16 ldt; /* 289 2 */ u16 tss; /* 291 2 */ long unsigned int tr; /* 293 8 */ long unsigned int safety; /* 301 8 */ long unsigned int return_address; /* 309 8 */ /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */ /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */ } __attribute__((__packed__)); Move misc_enable_saved to the end of the struct declaration so that saved_msrs fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary. The comment above the saved_context declaration says to fix wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through offsets which are computed at build-time. Update that comment accordingly. At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation from kmemleak but it is always good to avoid unaligned members for optimisation purposes. Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [ bp: Massage + cleanup commit message. ] Fixes: 7a9c2dd ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume") Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

matttbe added the bug label Apr 21, 2022

matttbe self-assigned this Apr 21, 2022

matttbe added the selftests label Apr 21, 2022

matttbe closed this as completed in 13757eb Apr 21, 2022

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

kmemleak: suspected mem leak in msr_build_context() #268

kmemleak: suspected mem leak in msr_build_context() #268

matttbe commented Apr 21, 2022 •

edited

Loading

matttbe commented Apr 22, 2022

kmemleak: suspected mem leak in msr_build_context() #268

kmemleak: suspected mem leak in msr_build_context() #268

Comments

matttbe commented Apr 21, 2022 • edited Loading

matttbe commented Apr 22, 2022

matttbe commented Apr 21, 2022 •

edited

Loading