Rename COC file so that GitHub can identify it

[nikhita]

@BenTheElder pointed out that our CoC is not identified by GitHub: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/community.

Looks like it needs to be named as CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md: https://help.github.com/articles/adding-a-code-of-conduct-to-your-project/.

/sig contributor-experience
/kind bug

[BenTheElder]

/lgtm
thanks!

[BenTheElder]

/assign @idvoretskyi

[nikhita]

/hold

Let's make sure it works in kubernetes-sigs/kind#31.

[castrojo]

/approve

But we'll likely need to update links across the repo and docs?

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: castrojo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [castrojo]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[BenTheElder]

Unfortunately this change didn't work in two other repos we tested it in. Probably we should move them back and contact GitHub

…

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018, 05:40 k8s-ci-robot ***@***.***> wrote: [APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is *APPROVED* This pull-request has been approved by: *castrojo <#2700 (comment)>* The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here <https://go.k8s.io/bot-commands>. The pull request process is described here <https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/owners.md#the-code-review-process> Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - OWNERS <https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/OWNERS> [castrojo] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment — You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2700 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA4BqwPDGsoSBz8ks-GTaCjkP0LpNh9Mks5ueNLbgaJpZM4W1ZAW> .

[nikhita]

We are reaching out to GitHub. I'll update here based on what we hear.

[nikhita]

From GitHub's reply:

Currently, the tool will only check specifically for code of conduct files that we recognize, not just the existence of a CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md. This was an intentional choice made to avoid giving folks a checkmark if they've got a file full of content that is not actually a code of conduct.

Will let the CoC committee take it forward.

Closing this PR since this won't help.
/close

[k8s-ci-robot]

@nikhita: Closing this PR.

In response to this:

From GitHub's reply:

Currently, the tool will only check specifically for code of conduct files that we recognize, not just the existence of a CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md. This was an intentional choice made to avoid giving folks a checkmark if they've got a file full of content that is not actually a code of conduct.

Will let the CoC committee take it forward.

Closing this PR since this won't help.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.