-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add external_openstack_lbaas_provider setting for occm #6566
Add external_openstack_lbaas_provider setting for occm #6566
Conversation
Hi @piequi. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
@floryut sorry about that late commit |
Wait.. Why don't you change all that But I would prefer to remove it entirely and do a check line 22, something like |
That's a good point ! |
...rnetes-apps/external_cloud_controller/openstack/templates/external-openstack-cloud-config.j2
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@floryut do you think we could have some more reviewers for this change ? |
@alijahnas any feedback on this openstack lbaas PR? |
@Miouge1 Sorry I wasn't very available lately to follow the PRs. It is necessary to have this because in the latest versions of OpenStack, the LBaaS provider should be set to "amphora". /lgtm |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: floryut, piequi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
* 'master' of https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubespray: remove variable 'etcd_ionice', because ionice removed from container image etcd:v3.4.x (kubernetes-sigs#6735) calico: default to using kdd datastore (kubernetes-sigs#6693) Update docker packages to 19.03.13 + add docker f32 (kubernetes-sigs#6712) Fix snapshot.storage apiVersion (kubernetes-sigs#6711) properly generate extravolumes in kubeadmconfig for centos (kubernetes-sigs#6708) Fix reserved memory unit in kubelet configuration (kubernetes-sigs#6725) Fix unintended SIGPIPE (kubernetes-sigs#6721) Expose offline install overrides in inventory (kubernetes-sigs#6728) Added ability to set calico vxlan vni and port. defaults to calico's … (kubernetes-sigs#6678) Change health check from TCP to HTTPS (kubernetes-sigs#6487) Add multi architeture support to flannel (kubernetes-sigs#6166) Remove pypi repo and pip extra flags (kubernetes-sigs#6729) Fails if kubeadm_version do not matches kubernetes version (kubernetes-sigs#6302) Add external_openstack_lbaas_provider setting for occm (kubernetes-sigs#6566) add new variable allowing additionnal audit webhook server options (kubernetes-sigs#6726) Fix example value for etcd_quota_backend_bytes (kubernetes-sigs#6724) Added support for setting tiller_service_account and tiller_replicas (kubernetes-sigs#6696)
…gs#6566) * Add external_openstack_lbaas_provider setting for occm * Integrate with existing lbaas_provider block * Refactor lbaas_provider config template block * Remove external_openstack_lbaas_use_octavia from sample inventory
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Add a new parameter in
openstack.yml
to be able to specify a loadbalancerv2 service provider and update config template file to include this new parameter.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #6565
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: