Table changes

[abishekTa-egov]

a lot of changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

• New Features

  • Enhanced pagination functionality in user access management, allowing dynamic adjustment of rows displayed per page.
  • Improved error handling for employee updates, providing clearer feedback to users.

• Style

  • Increased font size for the "CAMPAIGN_DETAILS" section in the Summary Screen for better visibility.

• Bug Fixes

  • Streamlined search criteria handling in API requests, improving overall performance and reliability.
  • Added validation checks for adding new formulas, ensuring data integrity during formula management.
  • Implemented checks to prevent deletion of mandatory formulas, enhancing formula management robustness.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to several components within the microplan module, primarily focusing on enhancing pagination and error handling in the UserAccess and UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper components. Changes include replacing hardcoded pagination values with dynamic references, updating API call structures, and refining error message handling. Additionally, minor UI adjustments are made in the SummaryScreen component, specifically related to font size. Overall, the changes aim to improve user interaction and data management without altering the core functionality.

Changes

File	Change Summary
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccess.js	Modified offset calculation in usePlanSearchEmployeeWithTagging to use rowsPerPage. Improved error handling in handleUpdateAssignEmployee for better user feedback.
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js	Added setRowsPerPage state variable for dynamic row management. Updated limit and offset in usePlanSearchEmployeeWithTagging. Introduced handleRowsPerPageChange function for handling pagination changes.
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js	Consolidated search criteria in searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig. Modified API call parameters to encapsulate tenantId, limit, and offset within the request body.
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SummaryScreen.js	Increased font size for "CAMPAIGN_DETAILS" section. Adjusted inline styles for card headers while maintaining existing component logic and structure.
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/FormulaConfiguration.js	Enhanced formula management with validation checks for adding new formulas and preventing deletion of mandatory formulas. Updated UI components to reflect these changes.

Suggested reviewers

• nipunarora-eGov

Poem

🐰 In the land of code where rabbits play,
Pagination dances, brightening the day.
With rows that change and errors that mend,
User access blooms, a joyful trend!
So hop along, let the data flow,
In our microplan garden, watch it grow! 🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 6

🧹 Outside diff range comments (5)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js (1)

Line range hint 48-56: Enhance error handling with more specific messages

The current error handling could be more informative. Consider providing more specific error messages based on the context of the failure (first API call vs second API call).

 } catch (error) {
   if (error?.response?.data?.Errors) {
     throw new Error(error.response.data.Errors[0].message);
   }
-  throw new Error("An unknown error occurred");
+  throw new Error(
+    `Failed to fetch employee data: ${error.message || 'An unknown error occurred'}`
+  );
 }

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SummaryScreen.js (1)

Line range hint 1-217: Consider architectural improvements for better maintainability

While reviewing the component, I noticed several areas where the architecture could be improved:

1. Props validation is missing, which could lead to runtime errors
2. The component handles multiple responsibilities and could benefit from being broken down
3. Error boundaries would help with graceful error handling

Consider these improvements:

1. Add PropTypes validation:

import PropTypes from 'prop-types';

SummaryScreen.propTypes = {
  props: PropTypes.shape({
    sessionData: PropTypes.object.isRequired
  }).isRequired
};

2. Extract card configurations into separate components or configuration files to reduce complexity
3. Implement an error boundary to handle potential rendering errors:

import { ErrorBoundary } from '@egovernments/digit-ui-react-components';

// Wrap the component content
<ErrorBoundary>
  <ViewComposer data={data} />
</ErrorBoundary>

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccess.js (3)

Line range hint 144-157: Improve error handling consistency and state management

1. There's inconsistent usage of semicolons after statements
2. Multiple state updates could potentially cause race conditions

Consider batching the state updates and maintaining consistent semicolon usage:

      onSuccess: (data) => {
        queryClient.invalidateQueries("PLAN_SEARCH_EMPLOYEE_WITH_TAGGING");
        refetchPlanEmployee();
-        setUnassignPopup(false)
-        setShowToast({ key: "success", label: t("UNASSIGNED_SUCCESSFULLY") });
-        setIsLoading(false);
+        setUnassignPopup(false);
+        setShowToast({ key: "success", label: t("UNASSIGNED_SUCCESSFULLY") });
+        setIsLoading(false);
      },
      onError: (error, variables) => {
-        setUnassignPopup(false)
-        setShowToast({ key: "error", label: error?.message ? error.message : t("FAILED_TO_UPDATE_RESOURCE") });
-        setIsLoading(false);
+        setUnassignPopup(false);
+        setShowToast({ key: "error", label: error?.message ? error.message : t("FAILED_TO_UPDATE_RESOURCE") });
+        setIsLoading(false);
      },

---

Line range hint 249-257: Remove commented code and implement search debouncing

The commented code in handleSearch function should be removed. Additionally, consider implementing debouncing for search to prevent excessive API calls.

  const handleSearch = (query) => {
-    // if (query?.length >= 2) {
    setSearchQuery(query);
-    // } else {
-    // setSearchQuery(null);
-    // }
-    // Handle search logic, such as filtering or API calls
  };

Consider implementing debouncing:

const debouncedSearch = Digit.Utils.debounce((query) => {
  setSearchQuery(query);
}, 300);

const handleSearch = (query) => {
  debouncedSearch(query);
};

---

Line range hint 91-94: Optimize useEffect dependencies

The useEffect has totalRows in its dependency array, but totalRows is only set based on planEmployee. This creates an unnecessary re-fetch cycle.

  useEffect(() => {
    refetchPlanEmployee();
-  }, [totalRows, currentPage, rowsPerPage, searchQuery]);
+  }, [currentPage, rowsPerPage, searchQuery]);

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3e214a9 and 2934e44.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccess.js (1 hunks)
• health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js (4 hunks)
• health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js (2 hunks)
• health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SummaryScreen.js (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (4)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccess.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SummaryScreen.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

📓 Learnings (1)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js (1)

Learnt from: Ramkrishna-egov
PR: egovernments/DIGIT-Frontend#1670
File: health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js:156-160
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:11.591Z
Learning: In the `UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper` component, since the `ShowMoreWrapper` is rendered within the cell, additional checks or row-specific state management are not required.

🔇 Additional comments (3)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js (3)

41-41: LGTM: State management for pagination is properly implemented.

The addition of setRowsPerPage setter function enables dynamic pagination control.

---

230-230: LGTM: DataTable pagination configuration is complete.

The onChangeRowsPerPage prop is correctly connected to the handler, completing the pagination implementation.

---

51-52: Verify API contract for pagination and role parameters.

A few observations about the API configuration:

1. The pagination logic is correctly implemented
2. The role parameter is now passed as an array [role] - ensure this matches the API contract
3. Consider adding rowsPerPage to the queryKey for proper cache invalidation when page size changes

Let's verify the API contract:

Also applies to: 57-58

✅ Verification successful

The role parameter format is correctly implemented as an array

Based on the codebase analysis:

1. The pagination parameters (limit, offset) are correctly passed through to the API
2. The role parameter is consistently used as an array across multiple components (UserAccess.js, UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js, PlanInbox.js, etc.)
3. The service implementation (searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js) properly handles the role parameter in the API request
4. The queryKey includes all necessary parameters (microplanId, role, currentPage) for proper cache management

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of this API to verify the role parameter format
ast-grep --pattern 'usePlanSearchEmployeeWithTagging({
  $$$
  body: {
    "PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria": {
      $$$
      role: $_,
      $$$
    }
  }
})'

Length of output: 168

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for the API usage patterns
rg -A 5 "usePlanSearchEmployeeWithTagging" 

# Also search for the role parameter usage in API calls
rg -A 5 "PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria.*role"

# Search for any test files or mock data that might show the API contract
fd -e test.js -e spec.js -e mock.js -X rg "PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria"

Length of output: 7852

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's look at the specific file to see how role is being used
rg -A 10 "PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria" health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js

# Also check the hook implementation for any role parameter handling
cat health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/usePlanSearchEmployeeWithTagging.js

Length of output: 1145

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the service implementation to see how the API call is made
cat health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js

# Also check other usages to see role parameter format
rg -A 5 "role: \[" health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/

Length of output: 7372

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range comments (2)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js (2)

Line range hint 24-29: Improve error handling specificity

The error message "Employee not found with the given role" is used for both API calls, making it difficult to identify which call failed. Consider using more specific error messages:

 if (!response) {
-  throw new Error("Employee not found with the given role");
+  throw new Error("No plan assignments found for the search criteria");
 }
 const uuids = response?.PlanEmployeeAssignment?.map((i) => i.employeeId);
 if (!uuids || uuids?.length === 0) {
   return null;
 }

---

Line range hint 30-39: Add batch processing for large UUID lists

The second API call concatenates all UUIDs into a single query parameter, which could cause issues with very long URLs or server-side limitations.

Consider implementing batch processing for large UUID lists:

const MAX_UUIDS_PER_BATCH = 50;
const processBatch = async (uuidBatch) => {
  return Digit.CustomService.getResponse({
    url: "/health-hrms/employees/_search",
    method: "POST",
    params: {
      ...params,
      userServiceUuids: uuidBatch.join(","),
    },
  });
};

// Process UUIDs in batches
const results = [];
for (let i = 0; i < uuids.length; i += MAX_UUIDS_PER_BATCH) {
  const batch = uuids.slice(i, i + MAX_UUIDS_PER_BATCH);
  const batchResult = await processBatch(batch);
  results.push(...batchResult.Employees);
}

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2934e44 and 4c1d484.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

🔇 Additional comments (2)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js (2)

3-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider parameter override risks and add input validation

The spread operator could potentially override the new values if they exist in PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria. Consider reversing the spread order:

 const updatedPlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria={
-  ...PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria,
   tenantId: tenantId,
   limit: limit,
   offset: offset,
+  ...PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria,
 }    

Also, as previously suggested, add validation for pagination parameters to prevent issues with invalid values.

---

16-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove unnecessary empty params object

The empty params object with commented code can be removed entirely since it serves no purpose.

-      params: {
-        
-        // sortOrder: sortOrder,
-      },
       body:{
-        PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria:{...updatedPlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria}
+        PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria: updatedPlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria
       }

[nipunarora-eGov]

check comments

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js (1)

Line range hint 1-48: Consider splitting the service calls for better maintainability

The current function handles two distinct API calls (plan-service and health-hrms). Consider splitting these into separate service functions for better maintainability and reusability:

1. searchPlanEmployeeAssignment
2. searchEmployeeHRMS
3. A wrapper function that combines both when needed

This would:

• Make the code more modular
• Allow independent usage of each service
• Make testing easier
• Improve error handling for each service

Would you like me to provide an example implementation of this refactoring?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4c1d484 and fe5de89.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/FormulaConfiguration.js (1 hunks)
• health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js (4 hunks)
• health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (3)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/FormulaConfiguration.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

📓 Learnings (1)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js (1)

Learnt from: Ramkrishna-egov
PR: egovernments/DIGIT-Frontend#1670
File: health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js:156-160
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:11.591Z
Learning: In the `UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper` component, since the `ShowMoreWrapper` is rendered within the cell, additional checks or row-specific state management are not required.

🔇 Additional comments (6)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js (2)

10-12: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Remove unnecessary empty params object and commented code

The empty params object with commented code should be removed for better code maintainability.

-      params: {
-        
-        // sortOrder: sortOrder,
-      },

---

13-15: Verify consistency of pagination implementation

The current implementation spreads the search criteria and adds pagination parameters, but we should verify if this matches the API contract and other similar implementations in the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the pagination implementation by checking the contents of these files.

---

Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response:

Pagination implementation is consistent with codebase patterns

The current implementation in searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js follows the established pattern across the microplan module where:

• Pagination parameters (limit and offset) are passed through the search criteria object
• The parameters are consistently spread into the PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria object
• This matches other implementations like searchSavedPlansWithCampaign.js and similar search endpoints

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar API calls to verify consistency
rg -A 5 "plan-service/employee/_search" --type js

# Look for other pagination implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'body: {
  $$$
  limit: $_,
  offset: $_
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 3550

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation in SearchHRMSEmployeeConfig.js
cat health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/SearchHRMSEmployeeConfig.js

# Check the implementation in searchSavedPlansWithCampaign.js
cat health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchSavedPlansWithCampaign.js

# Look for any other pagination implementations in the microplan module
rg -A 5 "limit.*offset" health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/

Length of output: 23146

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js (4)

41-41: LGTM: State management for pagination is properly implemented.

The addition of setRowsPerPage enables dynamic pagination control with an appropriate initial value.

---

176-182: LGTM: Pagination handlers are correctly implemented.

The handlers properly update pagination state, and the refetch logic has been moved to the useEffect hook as requested.

---

230-230: LGTM: DataTable pagination configuration is complete.

The onChangeRowsPerPage prop is properly connected to the handler, completing the pagination implementation.

---

51-52: LGTM: API configuration is properly structured.

The pagination parameters and role filtering are correctly implemented. The queryKey configuration will ensure proper cache management.

Let's verify the API response handling:

Also applies to: 57-58

✅ Verification successful

LGTM: Pagination and API configuration are correctly implemented

The code inspection confirms:

• The hook properly accepts and forwards pagination parameters (limit, offset)
• The component correctly calculates pagination with (currentPage - 1) * rowsPerPage
• The response data is properly handled through the select transform function
• The pagination state is managed appropriately with handlePaginationChange and handleRowsPerPageChange
• The component correctly updates when pagination changes through the useEffect hook

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the component properly handles API responses with the new configuration
ast-grep --pattern 'usePlanSearchEmployeeWithTagging({
  $$$
  config: {
    select: ($_) => {
      $$$
    }
  }
})'

Length of output: 120

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the hook exists and its usage pattern
rg -A 5 "usePlanSearchEmployeeWithTagging" 

# Also check for any API response handling patterns
rg -A 10 "select.*=.*{" health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/

Length of output: 7901

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the hook implementation and its response handling
cat health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/usePlanSearchEmployeeWithTagging.js

# Also check the component's usage of the response data
cat health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js

Length of output: 8504

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range comments (2)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js (2)

Line range hint 41-46: Enhance error handling structure

The current error handling can be improved to provide more context and preserve the original error for debugging.

Apply this diff to enhance error handling:

 } catch (error) {
   if (error?.response?.data?.Errors) {
-    throw new Error(error.response.data.Errors[0].message);
+    const apiError = error.response.data.Errors[0];
+    throw new Error(`API Error [${apiError.code}]: ${apiError.message}`);
   }
-  throw new Error("An unknown error occurred");
+  throw new Error(`Operation failed: ${error.message || 'Unknown error occurred'}`);
 }

This change:

1. Includes error codes in API errors for better tracking
2. Preserves the original error message when available
3. Provides more context for debugging

---

Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:

Add response validation for both API calls

The code should validate both the plan employee assignment response and employee data response structures. The search results show consistent usage patterns:

• PlanEmployeeAssignment is an array containing employee assignments
• TotalCount is a number field used for pagination
• Employee response contains an Employees array

Consider adding these validations:

const isValidPlanResponse = (resp) => 
  Array.isArray(resp?.PlanEmployeeAssignment) && 
  typeof resp?.TotalCount === 'number';

const isValidEmployeeResponse = (resp) =>
  Array.isArray(resp?.Employees);

if (!response || !isValidPlanResponse(response)) {
  return null;
}

if (!employeeData || !isValidEmployeeResponse(employeeData)) {
  return null;
}

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 22-24: Add response structure validation

The code assumes specific response structures without validation. This could lead to runtime errors if the API response format changes.

Let's verify the response structure expectations:

Consider adding type checking:

+ const isValidResponse = (resp) => 
+   resp?.PlanEmployeeAssignment?.length >= 0 && 
+   typeof resp?.TotalCount === 'number';

- if (!response) {
+ if (!response || !isValidResponse(response)) {

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of this response structure across the codebase
rg -A 2 'PlanEmployeeAssignment|TotalCount' --type js

# Search for similar response handling patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = $_?.map((i) => i.$_)'

Length of output: 22521

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fe5de89 and ae956ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

🔇 Additional comments (1)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanEmployeeWithTaggingConfig.js (1)

9-10: Remove empty params object and commented code

The empty params object with commented code should be removed as it serves no purpose.

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue

Add safety checks and validation for request body

The current implementation needs additional safety measures:

1. Add null checks before accessing nested properties
2. Validate pagination parameters

Apply this diff to improve safety:

 body: {
-  PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria:{...body.PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria,limit,offset,tenantId}
+  PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria: {
+    ...(body?.PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria || {}),
+    limit: Math.max(1, limit || 10),  // Ensure positive limit with default
+    offset: Math.max(0, offset || 0),  // Ensure non-negative offset
+    tenantId
+  }
 }

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	body:{
	PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria:{...body.PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria,limit,offset,tenantId}
	}
	body:{
	PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria: {
	...(body?.PlanEmployeeAssignmentSearchCriteria || {}),
	limit: Math.max(1, limit || 10), // Ensure positive limit with default
	offset: Math.max(0, offset || 0), // Ensure non-negative offset
	tenantId
	}
	}