Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update devcontainer image: v1.0.0-alpha.13 #2480

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

Update devcontainer image: v1.0.0-alpha.13 #2480

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

tarrencev
Copy link
Contributor

@tarrencev tarrencev commented Sep 25, 2024

Automated changes by create-pull-request GitHub action

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated Docker image version across various workflows to enhance the development and CI environments.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Transitioned to a newer version of the development container, which may include important updates and fixes.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Walkthrough

Ohayo, sensei! This pull request primarily updates the Docker image version across several configuration files related to the development and continuous integration environments. The image version has been incremented from v1.0.0-alpha.12 to v1.0.0-alpha.13, reflecting an upgrade that may include various improvements or fixes. This change affects the development container, GitHub Actions workflows, and the release dispatch configuration.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.devcontainer/devcontainer.json Image version updated from v1.0.0-alpha.12 to v1.0.0-alpha.13.
.github/workflows/bench.yml Docker image version changed from v1.0.0-alpha.12 to v1.0.0-alpha.13 in jobs bench-katana and bench-sozo.
.github/workflows/ci.yml Docker image version updated from v1.0.0-alpha.12 to v1.0.0-alpha.13 across multiple jobs.
.github/workflows/release-dispatch.yml Docker image updated from v1.0.0-alpha.12 to v1.0.0-alpha.13.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • glihm: A suggested reviewer for this pull request.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9f95a68 and 16433a4.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .devcontainer/devcontainer.json (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/bench.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (8 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release-dispatch.yml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/bench.yml
🔇 Additional comments not posted (8)
.github/workflows/release-dispatch.yml (2)

Line range hint 1-41: Ohayo again, sensei! Let's ensure everything plays nice with the new image.

The Docker image update looks good, but it's worth double-checking that the new image version (v1.0.0-alpha.13) is fully compatible with the existing workflow steps, especially the cargo release and cargo get commands.

To verify this, you could run the following checks:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence and versions of required tools in the new image

# Check if cargo and its required plugins are available
docker run --rm ghcr.io/dojoengine/dojo-dev:v1.0.0-alpha.13 sh -c '
    cargo --version && 
    cargo release --version && 
    cargo get --version
'

# Optionally, you can also check if the workflow runs successfully with the new image
# by triggering a test run of this workflow

If these checks pass, we can be more confident that the workflow will continue to function as expected with the new image version.


17-17: Ohayo, sensei! The Docker image has been updated.

The Docker image version has been bumped from v1.0.0-alpha.12 to v1.0.0-alpha.13. This change aligns with the PR objectives to update the devcontainer image.

Let's make sure this is the only place where the image version needs to be updated:

✅ Verification successful

Ohayo, sensei! It seems there was an issue while searching for the old Docker image version. Let's try a different approach to ensure all instances are updated correctly:


Verification Successful: No Instances of Old Docker Image Found

Ohayo, sensei! The old Docker image version ghcr.io/dojoengine/dojo-dev:v1.0.0-alpha.12 was not found in any YAML files. No further updates are needed.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any other occurrences of the old image version
rg "ghcr.io/dojoengine/dojo-dev:v1.0.0-alpha.12" --type yaml

Length of output: 225


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify no other occurrences of the old Docker image version exist
rg "ghcr.io/dojoengine/dojo-dev:v1.0.0-alpha.12" --type yaml

Length of output: 60

.github/workflows/ci.yml (6)

34-34: Ohayo, sensei! The Docker image update looks good!

The Docker image version has been successfully updated to v1.0.0-alpha.13 for the 'test' job. This change aligns perfectly with the PR objective.


58-58: Ohayo again, sensei! The 'ensure-wasm' job is looking sharp!

The Docker image for the 'ensure-wasm' job has been updated to v1.0.0-alpha.13. It's consistent with the previous change and the PR objective. Nice work!


123-123: Ohayo, sensei! The 'dojo-core-test' job is following the trend!

The Docker image for the 'dojo-core-test' job has been updated to v1.0.0-alpha.13. It's in perfect harmony with the previous changes and the PR objective. Excellent consistency!


138-138: Ohayo once more, sensei! The 'dojo-spawn-and-move-example-test' job is on point!

The Docker image for this job has been updated to v1.0.0-alpha.13. It's maintaining the perfect rhythm with the previous changes and the PR objective. Your consistency is impressive!


152-152: Ohayo, sensei! The 'dojo-world-bindings-check' job is in sync!

The Docker image for the 'dojo-world-bindings-check' job has been updated to v1.0.0-alpha.13. It's keeping up the perfect harmony with the previous changes and the PR objective. Your attention to detail is commendable!


161-161: Ohayo for the last time, sensei! The 'clippy', 'fmt', and 'docs' jobs are all in perfect harmony!

The Docker images for these three jobs have all been updated to v1.0.0-alpha.13. They're maintaining the flawless consistency with all previous changes and the PR objective. Your meticulous approach to updating all jobs is truly admirable!

Also applies to: 170-170, 179-179

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
// https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-dev-containers/tree/v0.245.2/containers/rust
{
"name": "Rust",
"image": "ghcr.io/dojoengine/dojo-dev:v1.0.0-alpha.12",
"image": "ghcr.io/dojoengine/dojo-dev:v1.0.0-alpha.13",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Ohayo, sensei! I've noticed a discrepancy with the devcontainer image version.

  • The devcontainer.json has been updated to use v1.0.0-alpha.13.
  • However, the release notes for v1.0.0-alpha.13 mention updating the devcontainer image to v1.0.0-alpha.12.

Please update the release notes to accurately reflect the current devcontainer image version.

🔗 Analysis chain

Ohayo, sensei! The image update looks good!

The devcontainer image has been successfully updated to the latest version. This change aligns perfectly with the PR objectives.

To ensure a smooth transition, let's verify if there are any significant changes or announcements related to this new version:

If any important changes are found, please make sure to communicate them to the development team, sensei!

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for release notes or changelogs for the new devcontainer image version

# Test: Search for any README, CHANGELOG, or release notes files
fd -i -e md -e txt '(readme|changelog|release.*notes)' | xargs rg -i 'v1\.0\.0-alpha\.13'

# Test: Check GitHub releases page for the new version
gh release view v1.0.0-alpha.13 --repo dojoengine/dojo

Length of output: 3665

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.61%. Comparing base (9f95a68) to head (16433a4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2480      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.64%   68.61%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         372      372              
  Lines       48441    48441              
==========================================
- Hits        33251    33240      -11     
- Misses      15190    15201      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@glihm glihm merged commit 881e1aa into main Sep 26, 2024
14 of 15 checks passed
@glihm glihm deleted the bump-devcontainer branch September 26, 2024 10:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants