TheOnlyStraightLineInNature

Hypothesis/Bold Prediction

The only straight line that exists in nature isn't located anywhere; rather, it's everywhere, all at once, at all times. The line I am referring to is known as the critical line. This is the line with real part $1/2$ in the complex plane on which the possible roots of the Riemann $\zeta$ (zeta) function can exist; the Greek letter $\zeta$ is the 6th letter in the Greek alphabet and corresponds to the letter 'z' in the English alphabet. The critical line can equivalently refer to the line with real part zero in the complex plane corresponding to the possible places the roots of the Hardy Z function can live.

This ties into the non-perturbative quantization of Yang-Mills theory and shows where random matrix theory jumped the shark. Consequently, this straight line underlies all of chemistry, including all of its orbitals, as well as all known forces of nature, with the exception of gravity. My research, building on the vast body of existing work, will show that there is another counterpart to positive mass, which is negative mass – a totally distinct attribute of mass and energy that is different from matter and antimatter – not only exists but also explains phenomena such as UFO propulsion, dark matter, and the topology of the super-space from which our universe emerged.

Furthermore, my theory will deepen our understanding of the cosmic microwave background radiation and confirm the Gaussian CMB hypothesis. Observable, testable predictions derived from this theory will suggest that there is an integer corresponding to our universe, which also corresponds to an index of a root of the zeta function. The distinct geometry and curvature around this root determine the parameters of what is known as the standard model of particle physics. By employing Bayesian inference and a set of fundamental principles, it should be possible to apply Voronin's universality theorem to locate the coordinates of the exact multipole spectrum observed in our CMB somewhere along a functional of the zeta function. From this, the parameters of the standard model should also emerge. There is no reason why Bayesian inference cannot be used to test these predictions to well above the five sigma standard in the field of particle physics.

Elaboration

1. Critical line of the Riemann Zeta Function: The Riemann zeta function $\zeta(s)$ in the field of complex analysis is a function of a complex number $s$. The "critical line" is the line $\text{Re}(s) = 1/2$, where the real part of $s$ is $1/2$. This line is a key object in the study of prime numbers and is intrinsically linked to the still unsolved Riemann Hypothesis, which suggests that all non-trivial zeros of the zeta function are located on this critical line.

2. Non-perturbative quantization of Yang-Mills theory: Yang-Mills theory is a class of gauge theory used in particle physics to describe elementary particles. Its quantization is crucial in quantum field theory, which shapes our understanding of the basic forces in the universe (except for gravity).

3. Underlying all of chemistry and the known forces of nature: The quantum field theories, such as Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) and Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), which are based on Yang-Mills theory, fundamentally underpin our understanding of chemistry and most forces of nature (electromagnetic, strong, and weak interactions). These theories dictate the behaviors of particles, which in turn shape the properties and interactions of atoms and molecules.

4. Negative mass and its implications: Negative mass is a hypothetical concept mostly discussed in the realms of exotic matter, general relativity, and quantum mechanics. It is not widely accepted in mainstream physics due to its counterintuitive properties and lack of experimental evidence. However, if negative mass does exist and behaves as speculated, it could explain unaccounted-for phenomena such as dark matter or exotic propulsion methods.

5. Topology of the "super-space": This refers to the concept of a higher-dimensional space from which our universe may have emerged. These theories are still mostly theoretical, and their implications for our universe are yet to be fully explored.

6. What mankind thinks they know about cosmology and the 'big bang': The prevailing cosmological model for the observable universe is the Big Bang theory, which suggests that the universe expanded from a very high-density and high-temperature state and continues to expand. The theory is supported by correlations between calculated and observed abundance of ancient light elements, isotropic radiation of the Cosmic Microwave Background, and the large scale structure of the universe. However, this model relies on a set of theories and laws that cannot fully explain everything observed in the universe, such as the nature of dark matter and dark energy.