Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

QA Report #206

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Jan 28, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

QA Report #206

code423n4 opened this issue Jan 28, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working disagree with severity Sponsor confirms validity, but disagrees with warden’s risk assessment (sponsor explain in comments) edited-by-warden grade-b Q-69 QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax sponsor disputed Sponsor cannot duplicate the issue, or otherwise disagrees this is an issue

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

See the markdown file with the details of this report here.
@code423n4 code423n4 added bug Something isn't working QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax labels Jan 28, 2023
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2023
@code423n4
ArmedGoose issue #206
6175bf8
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2023
@code423n4
ArmedGoose data for issue #206
42e3ae8
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2023
@code423n4
Report for issue #206 updated by ArmedGoose
66c65ec
@c4-sponsor c4-sponsor added the disagree with severity Sponsor confirms validity, but disagrees with warden’s risk assessment (sponsor explain in comments) label Feb 8, 2023
@c4-sponsor
Copy link

jonathandiep marked the issue as disagree with severity

@c4-sponsor
Copy link

jonathandiep marked the issue as sponsor disputed

@c4-sponsor c4-sponsor added the sponsor disputed Sponsor cannot duplicate the issue, or otherwise disagrees this is an issue label Feb 8, 2023
@jonathandiep
Copy link

While malicious code could technically exist inside the svg, it will be up to frontends to prevent xss. We also do not want to burn receipts (users should keep them)

@c4-judge c4-judge mentioned this issue Feb 16, 2023
Closed
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

kirk-baird marked the issue as grade-b

@C4-Staff C4-Staff added the Q-69 label Feb 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working disagree with severity Sponsor confirms validity, but disagrees with warden’s risk assessment (sponsor explain in comments) edited-by-warden grade-b Q-69 QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax sponsor disputed Sponsor cannot duplicate the issue, or otherwise disagrees this is an issue
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@jonathandiep @code423n4 @c4-judge @c4-sponsor @C4-Staff