Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #206 [1676531414343] #704

Closed
c4-judge opened this issue Feb 16, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #206 [1676531414343] #704

c4-judge opened this issue Feb 16, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value duplicate-552 partial-50 Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (50%)

Comments

@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

Judge has assessed an item in Issue #206 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows:

Issue 2: receipts are not burned upon claiming reward.

In my opinion, current system of just claiming some tokens to be "used" has some downsides:

in any claim check, users spend gas to iterate over these tokens too etc. there are two loops in only claim function that checks every token of user

@c4-judge c4-judge added the 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value label Feb 16, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor Author

kirk-baird marked the issue as duplicate of #119

@c4-judge c4-judge added the partial-50 Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (50%) label Feb 16, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor Author

kirk-baird marked the issue as partial-50

@c4-judge c4-judge reopened this Feb 16, 2023
@c4-judge c4-judge removed partial-50 Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (50%) duplicate-119 labels Feb 16, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor Author

kirk-baird marked the issue as not a duplicate

@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor Author

kirk-baird marked the issue as duplicate of #552

@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor Author

kirk-baird marked the issue as partial-50

@c4-judge c4-judge added the partial-50 Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (50%) label Feb 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value duplicate-552 partial-50 Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (50%)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant