Add track-to-track monitoring of HLT GSF electron tracks with respect to offline

[mmusich]

PR description:

Title says it all, supports track-to-track monitoring of HLT GSF electron tracks with respect to offline for both Run 3 (hltEgammaGsfTracks) and Phase 2 (hltEgammaGsfTracksL1Seeded).
In addition:

• add regular GSF tracking monitoring at HLT also in Phase-2;
• fix a bug in the vertex collection used for egmTrackingMonHLT

PR validation:

Run successfully both runTheMatrix.py -l 13034.0 -t 4 -j 8 (Run 3) and runTheMatrix.py -l 24834.0 -t 4 -j 8 (Phase 2) and observed the corresponding monitoring elements filled.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport, but it will be backported to CMSSW_14_0_X for data-taking purposes.

[mmusich]

cc:

@RSalvatico @swagata87

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44868/40120

• This PR adds an extra 40KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/EventContent/python/EventContent_cff.py modified in PR(s): [Dummy] Try creating big-enough cache to cause splitting #44368, first release of TICLv5 #44785
  • File DQMOffline/Trigger/python/TrackingMonitoring_Client_cff.py modified in PR(s): TrackingMonitoringClient: fix axis labels for fake rate vs OnlineLumi, LS and PU #44832

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/EventContent (operations)
• DQM/TrackingMonitorSource (dqm)
• DQMOffline/Trigger (dqm)

@fabiocos, @cmsbuild, @antoniovagnerini, @syuvivida, @nothingface0, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @davidlange6, @tjavaid, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@threus, @JanFSchulte, @fabiocos, @fioriNTU, @Martin-Grunewald, @mtosi, @cericeci, @Fedespring, @rociovilar, @arossi83, @HuguesBrun, @sroychow, @idebruyn, @jandrea, @missirol, @mmusich, @VourMa, @jhgoh, @VinInn, @trocino this is something you requested to watch as well.
@sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c56e70/39155/summary.html
COMMIT: 9b17e1a
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-04-29-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/44868/39155/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
24834.78 step 2
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

• You potentially added 2 lines to the logs
• ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
• Reco comparison results: 63 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3433373
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 137
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3433216
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 120633.12000000001 KiB( 48 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 12834.0,... ): 9634.955 KiB HLT/EGM
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 10470.565 KiB HLT/EGM
• Checked 206 log files, 170 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[swagata87]

type egamma, tracking

[mmusich]

@cms-sw/dqm-l2 this PR has been sitting idle for a week. Can you clarify plans for review and integration?
Thank you.

[tjavaid]

+1

[mmusich]

@cms-sw/orp-l2 is there is anything outstanding with this PR, can it be merged?
We'd like to have the backport (#44917) at Tier0 soon for HLT monitoring purposes.

[antoniovilela]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.