-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More refined error treatment in trend of efficiency vs lumi, PU and BX in SiStripHitEfficiencyHarvester
#41065
More refined error treatment in trend of efficiency vs lumi, PU and BX in SiStripHitEfficiencyHarvester
#41065
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41065/34666
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @tvami, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild , please test workflow 1001.3 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e20fe4/31302/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+alca |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
CalibTracker/SiStripHitEfficiency/interface/SiStripHitEfficiencyHelpers.h
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
CalibTracker/SiStripHitEfficiency/interface/SiStripHitEfficiencyHelpers.h
Show resolved
Hide resolved
a50bccd
to
dee8ecb
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41065/34681
|
Pull request #41065 was updated. @cmsbuild, @tvami, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild please test workflow 1001.3 |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUTThe relvals timed out after 4 hours. Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+alca
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
merge |
ping bot |
PR description:
This is a quick follow-up to #41050 introducing a more refined error treatment in trend of efficiency vs lumi, PU and BX in
SiStripHitEfficiencyHarvester
, using Clopper-Pearson confidence interval instead of naive binomial errors.I profit of this PR to address a couple of comments leftover in #41050:
PR validation:
Run successfully:
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport, but to be backported together with #41050 in 13.0.X