Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Retirement checking not functioning as intended due to Campaign Operations rating system #3817

Closed
SuperStucco opened this issue Jan 20, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3921 or #3933
Closed

Comments

@SuperStucco
Copy link

As with ship searches (#3753) and contract type generation (#3729), retirement checks are using the campaign rating as a modifier for the target number. When this is Campaign Operations the rating number is uncapped, so long term campaigns can get extremely large values compared to the limited level choices in the older Field Manual method.

This is currently in 49.12 but checking the current code base as of 49.17 the same problem will still be present.

IllianiCBT added a commit to IllianiCBT/mekhq that referenced this issue Mar 26, 2024
IllianiCBT added a commit to IllianiCBT/mekhq that referenced this issue Mar 27, 2024
IllianiCBT added a commit to IllianiCBT/mekhq that referenced this issue Mar 28, 2024
HammerGS added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2024
+ PR #3922: Add missing cockpit costs and weights
+ PR #3944: Added Nag Dialog for Pregnant Combatants
+ Fix #3943: Unmaintained Unit Nag Dialog Suppressed for Units set to
Salvage
+ PR #3933: Fixes for #3729,#3817,#3753: Clamped Unit Rating Mod for
CamOps (redux)
+ PR #3923: Hide Toughness When 0
+ PR #3915: Added Dialog to Confirm New Campaign (redux)
+ PR #3908: Adjusted Default Tech Counts
+ PR #3967: Adjusted Zoom Speed on Interstellar Map Panel
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
1 participant