Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: let the exceptions be thrown #1698

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 28, 2024
Merged

fix: let the exceptions be thrown #1698

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 28, 2024

Conversation

leogermani
Copy link
Contributor

All Submissions:

Changes proposed in this Pull Request:

See #1690 (review)

This PR reverts #1636

The pattern we use in Newsletters is not something we use in other plugins and we keep forgetting about it.

The pattern is that instead of returning errors, the methods will throw exceptions that we need to catch. This is the basis of the validate method so I followed the same thing for the whole Mailchimp Cache class.

In #1636, we are supressing this errors, and the result is that they are not being surfaced when they should.

The thing that we were solving in #1636 was not an issue, it was expected behavior, you can see by the methods doc blocks that they are expected to throw.

How to test the changes in this Pull Request:

Smoke test

Other information:

  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
  • Have you written new tests for your changes, as applicable?
  • Have you successfully ran tests with your changes locally?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 12.50000% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 20.46%. Comparing base (b7fd7e6) to head (e0c700b).
Report is 15 commits behind head on trunk.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ass-newspack-newsletters-mailchimp-cached-data.php 12.50% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##              trunk    #1698      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     20.35%   20.46%   +0.10%     
+ Complexity     2670     2660      -10     
============================================
  Files            48       48              
  Lines         10640    10614      -26     
============================================
+ Hits           2166     2172       +6     
+ Misses         8474     8442      -32     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@dkoo dkoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, on this branch after changing the Mailchimp API key to something invalid and refreshing the cache, I don't see any errors in the Settings page after the SURFACE_ERRORS_AFTER amount of time has passed. I also see some warnings in the debug log that seem related:

[11-Nov-2024 23:14:17 UTC] PHP Warning:  Undefined array key "lists" in /newspack-repos/newspack-newsletters/includes/service-providers/mailchimp/class-newspack-newsletters-mailchimp-cached-data.php on line 542
[11-Nov-2024 23:14:17 UTC] PHP Warning:  Undefined array key "lists" in /newspack-repos/newspack-newsletters/includes/service-providers/mailchimp/class-newspack-newsletters-mailchimp-cached-data.php on line 546
[11-Nov-2024 23:14:17 UTC] PHP Warning:  foreach() argument must be of type array|object, null given in /newspack-repos/newspack-newsletters/includes/service-providers/mailchimp/class-newspack-newsletters-mailchimp.php on line 629

The pattern we use in Newsletters is not something we use in other plugins and we keep forgetting about it.

The pattern is that instead of returning errors, the methods will throw exceptions that we need to catch. This is the basis of the validate method so I followed the same thing for the whole Mailchimp Cache class.

I wonder if we should retain this pattern since it keeps breaking our brains? Could we refactor the validate method to use WP_Errors instead of exceptions that we need to catch and handle manually? Maybe outside the scope of this PR, but I feel this pattern has anecdotally bitten us more than helped us.

@leogermani
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dkoo I can't reproduce what you described. This branch was outdated, so it might have contributed.

Here is what I see:

  • Having a healthy connection
  • I change the mailchimp api key to an invalid one
  • I see the error right away (because the cache is invalidated)
  • I go to line 304 and comment the if out, so the errors are stored right away
  • trigger the cron to refresh the cache (wp cron event run newspack_nl_mailchimp_refresh_cache)
  • I see that persistent error alert in all pages

Also, I noticed that we were never clearing the lists error. Fixed in e0c700b

@leogermani leogermani requested a review from dkoo November 14, 2024 20:13
@leogermani
Copy link
Contributor Author

I wonder if we should retain this pattern since it keeps breaking our brains? Could we refactor the validate method to use WP_Errors instead of exceptions that we need to catch and handle manually? Maybe outside the scope of this PR, but I feel this pattern has anecdotally bitten us more than helped us.

ah, and about this. You're probably right. We should use a pattern we use everywhere else... but I personally don't want to engage in this refactor right now :)

Copy link
Contributor

@dkoo dkoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is working for me after the refresh. Thanks, @leogermani!

@leogermani leogermani merged commit 85746b8 into trunk Nov 28, 2024
9 checks passed
@leogermani leogermani deleted the fix/supressed-errors branch November 28, 2024 14:58
Copy link

Hey @leogermani, good job getting this PR merged! 🎉

Now, the needs-changelog label has been added to it.

Please check if this PR needs to be included in the "Upcoming Changes" and "Release Notes" doc. If it doesn't, simply remove the label.

If it does, please add an entry to our shared document, with screenshots and testing instructions if applicable, then remove the label.

Thank you! ❤️

matticbot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2024
# [3.6.0-alpha.1](v3.5.0...v3.6.0-alpha.1) (2024-11-29)

### Bug Fixes

* let the exceptions be thrown ([#1698](#1698)) ([85746b8](85746b8))

### Features

* **ras-acc:** add reader account creation and login improvements ([#1716](#1716)) ([4640cae](4640cae))
* rate limit requests for CC ([#1714](#1714)) ([ad092ca](ad092ca))
@matticbot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.6.0-alpha.1 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants