-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Version 0.1.22 #438
Version 0.1.22 #438
Conversation
This reverts commit 394a0b2.
fix: Resolve reflection issue when running cognee a second time after…
* feat: parse repo to call graph * Update/repo_processor/top_down_repo_parse.py task * fix: minor improvements * feat: file parsing jedi script optimisation ---------
* Add type to DataPoint metadata * Add missing index_fields * Use DataPoint UUID type in pgvector create_data_points * Make _metadata mandatory everywhere
Added ability to search by datasets for cognee users Feature COG-912
#289) * feat: outsources chunking parameters to extract chunk from documents task
Removed lock that prevented using multiple datasets in cognify Fix COG-912
* feat: turn summarize_code into generator * feat: extract run_code_graph_pipeline, update the pipeline * feat: minimal code graph example * refactor: update argument * refactor: move run_code_graph_pipeline to cognify/code_graph_pipeline * refactor: indentation and whitespace nits * refactor: add deprecated use comments and warnings --------- Co-authored-by: Vasilije <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Igor Ilic <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Boris <[email protected]>
Added test to verify getting documents related to datasets intended for search Test COG-912
* feat: turn summarize_code into generator * feat: extract run_code_graph_pipeline, update the pipeline * feat: minimal code graph example * refactor: update argument * refactor: move run_code_graph_pipeline to cognify/code_graph_pipeline * refactor: indentation and whitespace nits * refactor: add deprecated use comments and warnings * Structured code summarization * add missing prompt file * Remove summarization_model argument from summarize_code and fix typehinting * minor refactors --------- Co-authored-by: lxobr <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vasilije <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Igor Ilic <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Boris <[email protected]>
Update get_cognify_router.py with graph endpoint
Resolve issue with default value for graph model in cognify endpoint Fix
Resolve typo in code chore COG-912
feat: Add search by dataset for cognee
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Push to docker hub
Resolve syntax issue with cognify router Fix
Added formatting and linting on pre-commit hook Feature COG-650
Update ruff lint options in pyproject file Chore
…e-bench-run Fix: deleting incorrect repo path
Added LlamaIndex Cognee integration notebook
…ting cognee in different packages
…allation fix: resolve issue with langfuse dependency installation
…ng-formatting Fix: Fixes logging setup
Llama index cognee integration notebook
…-from-bruteforce-search-and
fix: Fix ubuntu 24.04 segmentation fault
…-from-bruteforce-search-and
…memory-embeddings-from-bruteforce-search-and feat: deletes on the fly embeddings and uses edge collections
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
9573981 | Triggered | Generic Password | 7232b04 | notebooks/hr_demo.ipynb | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate this secret.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
No description provided.