Llama index cognee integration notebook #428
Conversation
Added LlamaIndex Cognee integration notebook
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces two changes to GitHub Actions workflows. A new workflow file Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/test_llama_index_cognee_integration_notebook.yml (2)
3-6: Consider restricting PR triggers to specific labelsSince the PR mentions this action won't pass until new versions are released, consider restricting the
pull_requesttrigger to run only when specific labels are added (e.g., "ready-for-testing") to prevent unnecessary failed runs.pull_request: types: [labeled, synchronize] + if: contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'ready-for-testing')
12-20: LGTM! Consider using repository variables for the notebook pathThe job configuration is well-structured and properly passes all required secrets. For better maintainability, consider moving the notebook path to repository variables.
- notebook-location: notebooks/llama_index_cognee_integration.ipynb + notebook-location: ${{ vars.LLAMA_INDEX_NOTEBOOK_PATH }}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/reusable_notebook.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/test_llama_index_cognee_integration_notebook.yml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (17)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
- GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
- GitHub Check: run_dynamic_steps_example_test / test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
- GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
- GitHub Check: run_multimedia_example_test / test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: profiler
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/reusable_notebook.yml (2)
Line range hint
57-62: Verify if the 20-minute timeout is sufficientThe notebook execution timeout is set to 1200 seconds (20 minutes). For integration tests that might involve API calls and complex operations, verify if this timeout is sufficient.
Consider monitoring the execution time in initial runs to adjust the timeout accordingly.
54-54: Verify the need for both LLM_API_KEY and OPENAI_API_KEYThere appears to be a redundancy as both environment variables point to the same secret. This might be intentional if different libraries require different environment variable names.
Run the following to check for usage of both variables in the notebook and dependencies:
✅ Verification successful
Both environment variables are necessary and serve different purposes
The
LLM_API_KEYis used by Cognee's core functionality, whileOPENAI_API_KEYis specifically required for the LlamaIndex integration. This is not a redundancy but a necessary configuration to support all integrations.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check usage of both API key environment variables echo "Checking for LLM_API_KEY usage:" rg "LLM_API_KEY" -A 3 echo -e "\nChecking for OPENAI_API_KEY usage:" rg "OPENAI_API_KEY" -A 3Length of output: 3933
Add Llama Index cognee integration notebook for the upcoming new version of the integration.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores