-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A Life Without range-v3 #124
Labels
Comments
I refined the ticket a bit. |
marehr
added a commit
to marehr/seqan3
that referenced
this issue
Jun 13, 2020
marehr
added a commit
to marehr/seqan3
that referenced
this issue
Jun 13, 2020
This was referenced Jun 13, 2020
marehr
added a commit
to marehr/seqan3
that referenced
this issue
Jun 19, 2020
marehr
added a commit
to marehr/seqan3
that referenced
this issue
Feb 3, 2021
This also makes the alphabet a bit less dependent on the meta library (seqan/product_backlog#124)
marehr
added a commit
to marehr/seqan3
that referenced
this issue
Feb 3, 2021
This also makes the alphabet a bit less dependent on the meta library (seqan/product_backlog#124)
This was referenced Apr 30, 2021
Core Meeting 07.02.2022supporting gcc-12 depends on 2 fixes upstream in the ranges-v3 library (see #402 ). Since we want to be independent of the ranges library in the near future anyway, The following could be the in-the-meantime solution: We fork the range-v3 library "now" and apply our fixes. |
This was referenced Apr 22, 2022
smehringer
added
the
ready to tackle
This story was discussed and can be immidietly tackled
label
Apr 25, 2022
This was referenced Apr 25, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Description
Click me
Stuff to reimplement or to abandon:
Concepts library:
Meta library:
(TODO: What to do!)
Ranges library:
<numeric>
didn't get an update)std::views::join
doesn't support)<seqan3/std/algorithm>
instead)<seqan3/std/algorithm>
instead)<seqan3/std/range>
instead, but I'm not sure why we forward declare,<seqan3/std/iterator>
might be enough.)<seqan3/std/range>
instead, but I'm not sure why we forward declare,<seqan3/std/iterator>
might be enough.)Stuff to reimplement or copy into contrib:
namespace concepts
incommon_tuple
andcommon_pair
Stuff to delete/deprecate and implement with other means (@SGSSGene)
take
andsingle
seqan3#2968Follow-up: #263
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: