Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-introduce "Flightmode improvements"" #3473

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 21, 2018

Conversation

philippotto
Copy link
Member

@philippotto philippotto commented Nov 20, 2018

Reverts #3472

Follow up is #3475

@philippotto philippotto changed the title Re-introduce "Flightmode improvements"" [WIP] Re-introduce "Flightmode improvements"" Nov 20, 2018
@philippotto philippotto changed the title [WIP] Re-introduce "Flightmode improvements"" Re-introduce "Flightmode improvements"" Nov 20, 2018
@philippotto philippotto self-assigned this Nov 20, 2018
@philippotto philippotto merged commit 82ab0f5 into master Nov 21, 2018
jfrohnhofen added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2018
* origin/master:
  Optimize performance for the list request /api/datasets (#3441)
  add annotation dataset foreign key  (#3482)
  thumbnails: correctly use zoom value if specified (#3487)
  Store Meshes in Postgres (#3367)
  fix alpha return (#3483)
  Added script to apply all new evolutions (#3427)
  Simple fix to speed up dataset gallery (#3480)
  better errors for screenshot tests, fix imports, refresh screenshots (#3479)
  (Backend only) Add project priority to progress report json (#3476)
  Handle missing write access on datastore (#3411)
  Re-introduce "Flightmode improvements"" (#3473)
  Circleci-notify: linkify PR number (#3469)
  Revert "Flightmode improvements" (#3472)
  also flow-ignore binaryData when using symlinks (#3471)
  Flightmode improvements (#3392)
  Circleci custom notification (#3465)
  enable /api/switch cross-organization (#3464)
@normanrz normanrz deleted the revert-3472-revert-3392-flightmode-improvement branch February 20, 2019 16:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants