Rollup of 4 pull requests

[workingjubilee]

Successful merges:

• Generate correct symbols.o for sparc-unknown-none-elf #131222 (Generate correct symbols.o for sparc-unknown-none-elf)
• remove const-support for align_offset and is_aligned #132423 (remove const-support for align_offset and is_aligned)
• Reduce dependence on the target name #132565 (Reduce dependence on the target name)
• remove attribute ids from hir stats (they're simply not needed) #132576 (remove attribute ids from hir stats (they're simply not needed))

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[workingjubilee]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=4

[bors]

📌 Commit 759e80d has been approved by workingjubilee

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 759e80d with merge 56c6a2f...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: workingjubilee
Pushing 56c6a2f to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Message	Perf Build Sha
#131222	Generate correct symbols.o for sparc-unknown-none-elf	b9ee68ee31d177be0ef8f72d095cde4599d4b56f (link)
#132423	remove const-support for align_offset and is_aligned	48c06ef3ea275cc1c29ab4d443adfa89ebd260be (link)
#132565	Reduce dependence on the target name	469c7d7fbd84de85598b1251575e1a8431dd55ca (link)
#132576	remove attribute ids from hir stats (they're simply not nee…	d29fb7441b5591c6761f35a7e030f79b13863a1f (link)

previous master: 706eec8ce1

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (56c6a2f): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.4%	[0.3%, 0.4%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.4%	[-1.4%, -1.4%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.2%, secondary 2.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.2%	[1.2%, 1.2%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.9%	[2.7%, 3.0%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.2%	[1.2%, 1.2%]	1

Cycles

Results (secondary -2.8%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.8%	[-2.8%, -2.8%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

Results (primary 0.0%, secondary 0.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	21
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	21

Bootstrap: 778.282s -> 779.582s (0.17%)
Artifact size: 335.31 MiB -> 335.21 MiB (-0.03%)