Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a min_obstacle_height param to the nav2_costmap_2d's ObstacleLayer plugin (backport #3211) #3215

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 22, 2022

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Sep 22, 2022

This is an automatic backport of pull request #3211 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

…r plugin (#3211)

This allows considering full range observations, specified by the
  <data source>.min_obstacle_height
and
  <data source>.max_obstacle_height
especially used for the raytracing, but to still be able to specify a
minimum obstacle height to report obstacles onto the costmap.

This is in particular required in the case a PointCloud2 source points
slightly towards the ground, sometimes detecting obstacles, that should be
cleared once the ground reappears behind the obstacle when it has moved
away: we don't want to detect the ground as an obstacle, but still want it
to be used in the raytracing to clear the previously detected obstacle.

(cherry picked from commit 0b4179b)
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Sep 22, 2022

@mergify[bot], all pull requests must be targeted towards the main development branch.
Once merged into main, it is possible to backport to @humble, but it must be in main
to have these changes reflected into new distributions.

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Sep 22, 2022

@mergify[bot], please properly fill in PR template in the future. @SteveMacenski, use this instead.

  • Check that any new parameters added are updated in navigation.ros.org
  • Check that any significant change is added to the migration guide
  • Check that any new features OR changes to existing behaviors are reflected in the tuning guide
  • Check that any new functions have Doxygen added
  • Check that any new features have test coverage
  • Check that any new plugins is added to the plugins page
  • If BT Node, Additionally: add to BT's XML index of nodes for groot, BT package's readme table, and BT library lists

@SteveMacenski SteveMacenski merged commit 48c7dc0 into humble Sep 22, 2022
@SteveMacenski SteveMacenski deleted the mergify/bp/humble/pr-3211 branch September 22, 2022 17:54
hyunseok-yang pushed a commit to lge-ros2/navigation2 that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2022
…r plugin (ros-navigation#3211) (ros-navigation#3215)

This allows considering full range observations, specified by the
  <data source>.min_obstacle_height
and
  <data source>.max_obstacle_height
especially used for the raytracing, but to still be able to specify a
minimum obstacle height to report obstacles onto the costmap.

This is in particular required in the case a PointCloud2 source points
slightly towards the ground, sometimes detecting obstacles, that should be
cleared once the ground reappears behind the obstacle when it has moved
away: we don't want to detect the ground as an obstacle, but still want it
to be used in the raytracing to clear the previously detected obstacle.

(cherry picked from commit 0b4179b)

Co-authored-by: milidam <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants