Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Possibility to use tags #262

Closed
graysky2 opened this issue Apr 4, 2013 · 6 comments
Closed

Possibility to use tags #262

graysky2 opened this issue Apr 4, 2013 · 6 comments

Comments

@graysky2
Copy link

graysky2 commented Apr 4, 2013

Have you guys considered the possibility of tagging your releases? This would avoid the need for distro packagers to do a git clone --depth 1 git://github.com/raspberrypi/linux.git to bring down the source for compilation.
@popcornmix
Copy link
Collaborator

Can you be more explicit about what you would like?
Are you suggesting every commit to linux repo is tagged? Or just the points where the firmware repo is rebuilt? Or just the points where an sdcard release?
What would like the tag to consist of?

@graysky2
Copy link
Author

graysky2 commented Apr 5, 2013

I do not think every push should tagged at all... just points at which a distro would likely do a pkgrel or version bump. Only when new key changes are made I guess.

In terms of the content of the tag, nothing fancy. For example, I tend to use the following scheme in my stuff:
git tag v5.23 -m 'v5.32 && git push --tags'

You can use whatever kind of naming system you want, the key is that the tag is there so now I can point a package to a tarball github auto generates.

Example: https://github.com/graysky2/profile-sync-daemon/tags

@richo
Copy link

richo commented Apr 5, 2013

Bonus points if you can sign the tags with a PGP key with some trust behind
it.

On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:37 PM, graysky [email protected] wrote:

I do not think every push should tagged at all... just points at which a
distro would likely do a pkgrel or version bump. Only when new key changes
are made I guess.

In terms of the content of the tag, nothing fancy. For example, I tend to
use the following scheme in my stuff:
git tag v5.23 -m 'v5.32 && git push --tags'

You can use whatever kind of naming system you want, the key is that the
tag is there so now I can point a package to a tarball github auto
generates.

Example: https://github.com/graysky2/profile-sync-daemon/tags

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/262#issuecomment-15951108
.

@graysky2 graysky2 mentioned this issue Apr 9, 2013
Closed
@graysky2
Copy link
Author

graysky2 commented Apr 9, 2013

@richo - The tag is really harmless so no need for any kind of signing. The security lies in the access to the source itself which is well protected with pub/priv keys.

popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 1, 2013
@lizf-os @htejun
cpuset: fix RCU lockdep splat
27e89ae 
5d21cc2 ("cpuset: replace
cgroup_mutex locking with cpuset internal locking") incorrectly
converted proc_cpuset_show() from cgroup_lock() to cpuset_mutex.
proc_cpuset_show() is accessing cgroup hierarchy proper to determine
cgroup path which can't be protected by cpuset_mutex.  This triggered
the following RCU warning.

 ===============================
 [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
 3.8.0-rc3-next-20130114-sasha-00016-ga107525-dirty #262 Tainted: G        W
 -------------------------------
 include/linux/cgroup.h:534 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

 other info that might help us debug this:

 rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
 2 locks held by trinity/7514:
  #0:  (&p->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff812b06aa>] seq_read+0x3a/0x3e0
  #1:  (cpuset_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff811abae4>] proc_cpuset_show+0x84/0x190

 stack backtrace:
 Pid: 7514, comm: trinity Tainted: G        W
+3.8.0-rc3-next-20130114-sasha-00016-ga107525-dirty #262
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff81182cab>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x10b/0x120
  [<ffffffff811abb71>] proc_cpuset_show+0x111/0x190
  [<ffffffff812b0827>] seq_read+0x1b7/0x3e0
  [<ffffffff812b0670>] ? seq_lseek+0x110/0x110
  [<ffffffff8128b4fb>] do_loop_readv_writev+0x4b/0x90
  [<ffffffff8128b776>] do_readv_writev+0xf6/0x1d0
  [<ffffffff8128b8ee>] vfs_readv+0x3e/0x60
  [<ffffffff8128b960>] sys_readv+0x50/0xd0
  [<ffffffff83d33d18>] tracesys+0xe1/0xe6

The operation can be performed under RCU read lock.  Replace
cpuset_mutex locking with RCU read locking.

tj: Rewrote patch description.

Reported-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
@notro notro mentioned this issue Dec 29, 2014
Closed
@Ruffio
Copy link

Ruffio commented Aug 29, 2016

@popcornmix this issue/feature request should be closed due to inactivity

@popcornmix
Copy link
Collaborator

Tags are now added when we update kernel is raspbian. See: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/tags

popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2018
@virtuoso @gregkh
stm class: Use vmalloc for the master map
d45c6ef 
commit b5e2ced upstream.

Fengguang is running into a warning from the buddy allocator:

> swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:9, mode:0x14040c0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_COMP), nodemask=(null)
> CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.17.0-rc1 #262
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
...
>  __kmalloc+0x14b/0x180: ____cache_alloc at mm/slab.c:3127
>  stm_register_device+0xf3/0x5c0: stm_register_device at drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c:695
...

Which is basically a result of the stm class trying to allocate ~512kB
for the dummy_stm with its default parameters. There's no reason, however,
for it not to be vmalloc()ed instead, which is what this patch does.

Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected] # v4.4+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2018
@virtuoso @gregkh
stm class: Use vmalloc for the master map
1f8c4ed 
commit b5e2ced upstream.

Fengguang is running into a warning from the buddy allocator:

> swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:9, mode:0x14040c0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_COMP), nodemask=(null)
> CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.17.0-rc1 #262
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
...
>  __kmalloc+0x14b/0x180: ____cache_alloc at mm/slab.c:3127
>  stm_register_device+0xf3/0x5c0: stm_register_device at drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c:695
...

Which is basically a result of the stm class trying to allocate ~512kB
for the dummy_stm with its default parameters. There's no reason, however,
for it not to be vmalloc()ed instead, which is what this patch does.

Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected] # v4.4+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 9, 2023
@borkmann @anakryiko
selftest/bpf: Add various selftests for program limits
d1a783d 
Add various tests to check maximum number of supported programs
being attached:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [    1.185325] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
  [    1.186826] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
  [    1.270123] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.988 MHz
  [    1.272428] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fc932722, max_idle_ns: 440795381586 ns
  [    1.276408] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc
  #252     tc_opts_after:OK
  #253     tc_opts_append:OK
  #254     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #255     tc_opts_before:OK
  #256     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #257     tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK
  #258     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #259     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #260     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #261     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #262     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #263     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #264     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #265     tc_opts_max:OK              <--- (new test)
  #266     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #267     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #268     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #269     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 18/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Test bpf_mprog query API via libbpf and raw syscall
f9b0879 
Add a new test case which performs double query of the bpf_mprog through
libbpf API, but also via raw bpf(2) syscall. This is testing to gather
first the count and then in a subsequent probe the full information with
the program array without clearing passed structs in between.

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [    1.398818] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.999 MHz
  [    1.400263] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fd336761, max_idle_ns: 440795243819 ns
  [    1.402734] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc
  [    1.426639] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
  [    1.428112] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
  #252     tc_opts_after:OK
  #253     tc_opts_append:OK
  #254     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #255     tc_opts_before:OK
  #256     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #257     tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK
  #258     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #259     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #260     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #261     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #262     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #263     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #264     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #265     tc_opts_max:OK
  #266     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #267     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #268     tc_opts_query:OK            <--- (new test)
  #269     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #270     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 19/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Test query on empty mprog and pass revision into attach
685446b 
Add a new test case to query on an empty bpf_mprog and pass the revision
directly into expected_revision for attachment to assert that this does
succeed.

  ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [    1.406778] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.990 MHz
  [    1.408863] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fcaf6eb0, max_idle_ns: 440795321766 ns
  [    1.412419] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc
  [    1.428671] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
  [    1.430260] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
  #252     tc_opts_after:OK
  #253     tc_opts_append:OK
  #254     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #255     tc_opts_before:OK
  #256     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #257     tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK
  #258     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #259     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #260     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #261     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #262     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #263     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #264     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #265     tc_opts_max:OK
  #266     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #267     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #268     tc_opts_query:OK
  #269     tc_opts_query_attach:OK     <--- (new test)
  #270     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #271     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 20/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@richo @graysky2 @popcornmix @Ruffio