-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixing restyled to ignore third_party #392
Fixing restyled to ignore third_party #392
Conversation
Not sure why the restyled check is counting here (build fails because branch is gone)... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks cleaner than before. Thanks
- "third_party/**/*" | ||
- "third_party/**" | ||
- "third_party/*" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is really unfortunate. is restyled really this stupid?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure it is a multiple 'really' level of unfortunate, but it seems to work for now. Trying to pair it back down as I understand their syntax.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed to single level really
- "third_party/**/*" | ||
- "third_party/**" | ||
- "third_party/*" | ||
- "build/**/*" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we want restyled looking at build, as long as the files are part of the git repository
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"We want" can you explain? which we don't want?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we want restyled to look at all the things in build/ that are in git
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be addressed separately. For now, we're should ignore build, we can bring this back in later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aside: Ideally, we should have a real build directory then, given it's a mix of built products, and scripts
- "third_party/**" | ||
- "third_party/*" | ||
- "build/**/*" | ||
- "autom4te.cache/**/*" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
there are no files in this directory in git...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup, but it matters for locally restyled
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
restyled can't look at .gitignore? I guess this is no biggie, but it means .gitignore and this file have to be kept in sync.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correct, feel free to open up an issue there.
corresponding to the number of months since January 1, 2020, and generally mean | ||
the last Friday of that month. E.g. M1 corresponds to EOB January 24, | ||
|
||
2020. The Morrow milestone is a special milestone that means "unprioritized" or |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is a misfire, "2020." isn't a numbered list item.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's following the default .md formatter. Do we have a config anywhere we should use? We are not going to manually verify each thing the restyler does and accept/decline it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should probably just trick the thing by wrapping it another way
yes: I plan to verify everything the restyler does, lest we break our tree.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved.
Merge in WMN_TOOLS/matter from feature/wifi_gsdk_integration_slc_1.0 to silabs_slc_1.0 Squashed commit of the following: commit 819dccc274991177cf95ea95ddf5219b9affe87a Author: Rehan Rasool <[email protected]> Date: Thu Dec 15 15:26:50 2022 -0500 Remove brd4187c from supported wi-fi boards as it does not compile commit 9934ca51034e338aab1bcf7e2a031c4f98e8e090 Author: Rehan Rasool <[email protected]> Date: Thu Dec 15 14:31:20 2022 -0500 Fix Wi-Fi stash name so when SQA stage is enabled, it works same way as it does for Ninja builds commit 305a3d7e4a953e359c3102640651899d072f912f Author: Rehan Rasool <[email protected]> Date: Thu Dec 15 14:28:21 2022 -0500 Fix missed board compatibilities for wi-fi apps ... and 25 more commits
Problem
third_party is kicking restyled, need to fix that
Summary of Changes
Ongoing... testing