Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop sbt 0.13 support #294

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 19, 2019
Merged

Drop sbt 0.13 support #294

merged 4 commits into from
Dec 19, 2019

Conversation

marcospereira
Copy link
Member

Copy link
Member

@ignasi35 ignasi35 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ready when interplay 3.0.0 is available.

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
addSbtPlugin("com.typesafe.play" % "interplay" % sys.props.get("interplay.version").getOrElse("2.1.4"))
addSbtPlugin("com.typesafe.play" % "interplay" % sys.props.get("interplay.version").getOrElse("2.1.5-ee0cdca"))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If only interplay was using sbt-dynver :trollface:

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 902f5ef into playframework:master Dec 19, 2019
@marcospereira marcospereira deleted the build/drop-sbt-0.13 branch December 19, 2019 14:05
libraryDependencies ++= scalaParserCombinators(scalaVersion.value),
libraryDependencies += "com.novocode" % "junit-interface" % "0.11" % "test",
libraryDependencies += "org.scalatest" %%% "scalatest" % ScalaTestVersion % "test",
libraryDependencies += "org.scala-lang.modules" %% "scala-parser-combinators" % ScalaParserCombinatorsVersion % "optional",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@marcospereira @mkurz
Folks, do you remember, why scope of scala-parser-combinators was changed to optional? 🤔

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think optional makes sense here anymore. It was added in f288c70. I checked out that revision, removed scala-parser-combinators and it still compiled. It seems things changed since then.
We can remove optional here I think since twirl seems to not work anymore without scala-parser-combinators.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants