-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sink task range seems too short to stuck the sink #10169
Labels
affects-6.5
This bug affects the 6.5.x(LTS) versions.
affects-7.1
This bug affects the 7.1.x(LTS) versions.
affects-7.5
This bug affects the 7.5.x(LTS) versions.
area/ticdc
Issues or PRs related to TiCDC.
severity/minor
type/bug
The issue is confirmed as a bug.
Comments
This was referenced Nov 29, 2023
hicqu
added a commit
to hicqu/ticdc
that referenced
this issue
Nov 29, 2023
Signed-off-by: qupeng <[email protected]>
hicqu
added a commit
to hicqu/ticdc
that referenced
this issue
Nov 29, 2023
Signed-off-by: qupeng <[email protected]>
hicqu
added a commit
to ti-chi-bot/tiflow
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2023
Signed-off-by: qupeng <[email protected]>
hicqu
added a commit
to hicqu/ticdc
that referenced
this issue
Dec 2, 2023
Signed-off-by: qupeng <[email protected]>
hicqu
added a commit
to hicqu/ticdc
that referenced
this issue
Dec 2, 2023
Signed-off-by: qupeng <[email protected]>
hicqu
added a commit
to ti-chi-bot/tiflow
that referenced
this issue
Dec 4, 2023
close pingcap#10168 Signed-off-by: qupeng <[email protected]>
hicqu
added a commit
to hicqu/ticdc
that referenced
this issue
Dec 5, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
affects-6.5
This bug affects the 6.5.x(LTS) versions.
affects-7.1
This bug affects the 7.1.x(LTS) versions.
affects-7.5
This bug affects the 7.5.x(LTS) versions.
area/ticdc
Issues or PRs related to TiCDC.
severity/minor
type/bug
The issue is confirmed as a bug.
What did you do?
Currently in TiCDC component
SinkManager
, a sink task is limited to only cover time ranges less than5s
.What did you expect to see?
This behavior is expected to make tables more balance.
What did you see instead?
However,
5s
seems is too short. Please consider this case:So a table can be scheduled with an interval more than
5s
. Then checkpoint lag will keep increasing.It's not expected. We should correct it.
Versions of the cluster
Upstream TiDB cluster version (execute
SELECT tidb_version();
in a MySQL client):(paste TiDB cluster version here)
Upstream TiKV version (execute
tikv-server --version
):(paste TiKV version here)
TiCDC version (execute
cdc version
):(paste TiCDC version here)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: