Map component versions to RHOAI status for better visibility

[ugiordan]

Description

This Pull Request updates the RHOAI operator to include component versions in its status, improving visibility and tracking.

Key updates:

• Added logic to map component versions to the operator status.
• Created a generic action to retrieve release metadata for each component.
• Ensured compatibility with existing workflows.

Please review and share your feedback!

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshot or short clip

Merge criteria

• You have read the contributors guide.
• Commit messages are meaningful - have a clear and concise summary and detailed explanation of what was changed and why.
• Pull Request contains a description of the solution, a link to the JIRA issue, and to any dependent or related Pull Request.
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

[openshift-ci]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from ugiordan. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[github-actions]

This PR can't be merged just yet 😢

Please run make generate manifests api-docs and commit the changes.

For more info: https://github.com/opendatahub-io/opendatahub-operator/actions/runs/12933723734

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 70.23810% with 25 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 20.37%. Comparing base (90a78ea) to head (56114de).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ns/status/releases/action_fetch_releases_status.go	85.50%	7 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
pkg/resources/resources.go	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
...s/components/workbenches/workbenches_controller.go	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...llers/components/codeflare/codeflare_controller.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...ciencepipelines/datasciencepipelines_controller.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
controllers/components/kueue/kueue_controller.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...mponents/modelregistry/modelregistry_controller.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
controllers/components/ray/ray_controller.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...ts/trainingoperator/trainingoperator_controller.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...rollers/components/trustyai/trustyai_controller.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1559      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   19.98%   20.37%   +0.38%     
==========================================
  Files         159      160       +1     
  Lines       10780    10864      +84     
==========================================
+ Hits         2154     2213      +59     
- Misses       8396     8418      +22     
- Partials      230      233       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[lburgazzoli]

guess if the process of reading and parsing the file could be done once and then cached, it should not change for the lifecycle of the operator (unless devFlags are set)

[ykaliuta]

guess if the process of reading and parsing the file could be done once and then cached, it should not change for the lifecycle of the operator (unless devFlags are set)

Can it be calculated in Init()s into componentHandler{} structure, then stored in the Reconciler{} on NewComponentReconciler(), then propagated to ReconcileRequest{} from Reconcile() and applied by Client.ApplyStatus()?

[ykaliuta]

Some caching abstraction experiments #1563

[github-actions]

This PR can't be merged just yet 😢

Please run make generate manifests api-docs and commit the changes.

For more info: https://github.com/opendatahub-io/opendatahub-operator/actions/runs/12948752246

[github-actions]

This PR can't be merged just yet 😢

Please run make generate manifests api-docs and commit the changes.

For more info: https://github.com/opendatahub-io/opendatahub-operator/actions/runs/12948759806

[github-actions]

This PR can't be merged just yet 😢

Please run make generate manifests api-docs and commit the changes.

For more info: https://github.com/opendatahub-io/opendatahub-operator/actions/runs/12948979661

[github-actions]

This PR can't be merged just yet 😢

Please run make generate manifests api-docs and commit the changes.

For more info: https://github.com/opendatahub-io/opendatahub-operator/actions/runs/12949054748

[github-actions]

This PR can't be merged just yet 😢

Please run make generate manifests api-docs and commit the changes.

For more info: https://github.com/opendatahub-io/opendatahub-operator/actions/runs/12992694058

[github-actions]

This PR can't be merged just yet 😢

Please run make generate manifests api-docs and commit the changes.

For more info: https://github.com/opendatahub-io/opendatahub-operator/actions/runs/12992700715

[github-actions]

This PR can't be merged just yet 😢

Please run make generate manifests api-docs and commit the changes.

For more info: https://github.com/opendatahub-io/opendatahub-operator/actions/runs/13034117014

[github-actions]

This PR can't be merged just yet 😢

Please run make generate manifests api-docs and commit the changes.

For more info: https://github.com/opendatahub-io/opendatahub-operator/actions/runs/13036573183

[ugiordan]

I've intentionally excluded the Workbenches component from the e2e tests for now, as we need to align the workbenches_test.go file with the structure of the other component tests.

[github-actions]

This PR can't be merged just yet 😢

Please run make generate manifests api-docs and commit the changes.

For more info: https://github.com/opendatahub-io/opendatahub-operator/actions/runs/13036711717

[ykaliuta]

/test opendatahub-operator-e2e

[ugiordan]

I've commented out the e2e tests for KServe and MM Serving while waiting for their metadata to be placed in the correct manifest folder.

I'll reintroduce the tests in a separate PR, which will also include some e2e test code optimizations.

[ugiordan]

/test opendatahub-operator-e2e

[openshift-ci]

@ugiordan: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/opendatahub-operator-e2e	dced420	link	true	/test opendatahub-operator-e2e

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.