Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(mentions): parse groups and federated user mentions #11676

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

Antreesy
Copy link
Contributor

☑️ Resolves

🖌️ UI Checklist

🖼️ Screenshots / Screencasts

image

🏁 Checklist

  • 🌏 Tested with Chrome, Firefox and Safari or should not be risky to browser differences
  • 🖥️ Should not be risky for Desktop client
  • ⛑️ Tests are included or not possible

@Antreesy Antreesy added 3. to review feature: chat 💬 Chat and system messages feature: frontend 🖌️ "Web UI" client labels Feb 28, 2024
@Antreesy Antreesy added this to the 💞 Next Major (29) milestone Feb 28, 2024
@Antreesy Antreesy requested a review from DorraJaouad February 28, 2024 17:43
@Antreesy Antreesy self-assigned this Feb 28, 2024
src/utils/textParse.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/utils/textParse.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Antreesy Antreesy force-pushed the feat/noid/mention-federated-users-frontend branch 2 times, most recently from 5770ba1 to b067788 Compare February 29, 2024 18:48
@Antreesy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Antreesy commented Feb 29, 2024

amended tests only

@Antreesy Antreesy enabled auto-merge February 29, 2024 18:48
@Antreesy Antreesy force-pushed the feat/noid/mention-federated-users-frontend branch from b067788 to bb12e7a Compare February 29, 2024 18:52
@nickvergessen nickvergessen merged commit 3448a4c into main Feb 29, 2024
44 of 45 checks passed
@nickvergessen nickvergessen deleted the feat/noid/mention-federated-users-frontend branch February 29, 2024 19:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants