Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update solvers to MOI v0.9 #736

Closed
20 tasks done
blegat opened this issue May 17, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed
20 tasks done

Update solvers to MOI v0.9 #736

blegat opened this issue May 17, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@blegat
Copy link
Member

blegat commented May 17, 2019 •
edited by joaquimg
Loading

Updates to do:

  • Remove MOI.SingleVariable from the arguments of the @model macro.
  • Implement MOI.DualObjectiveValue.
  • Indices of MOI.SingleVariable constraints need to have the same index that the variable
  • Implement MOI.Silent, MOI.SolveTime, MOI.RawStatusString, MOI.TimeLimitSec.
  • Update the test script to follow the new guideline: http://www.juliaopt.org/MathOptInterface.jl/dev/apimanual/#Testing-guideline-1
  • Add support for MOI.RawParameter.
  • Rename MOIU.getconstant and MOI._constant to MOI.constant.
  • Rename access to the resultindex field of MOI.ObjectiveValue to result_index.

For more details on what changed, see #737

List of solvers is taken from http://www.juliaopt.org/JuMP.jl/dev/installation/#Getting-Solvers-1:
@chriscoey chriscoey mentioned this issue May 17, 2019
Closed
@rschwarz
Copy link
Contributor

I think it would be good to merge #712 first. Right now, most MIP solvers will fail the Indicator tests, because the bridge is missing.

In SCIP, we have an implementation in a PR, but I think it would be cleaner to upgrade to MOI 0.9 first, then support Indicator constraints natively.

@rschwarz rschwarz mentioned this issue May 17, 2019
Merged
@blegat blegat mentioned this issue May 17, 2019
Merged
This was referenced May 25, 2019
Merged
Merged
Merged
@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented May 28, 2019

GLPK, Ipopt, and SCS are the absolute minimum set of solvers needed to be ready before we tag MOI 0.9 so that we can run JuMP's examples under MOI 0.9.

This was referenced May 30, 2019
Merged
Merged
Merged
@coroa coroa mentioned this issue Jun 13, 2019
Closed
@Wikunia Wikunia mentioned this issue Jul 4, 2019
Closed
coroa added a commit to coroa/JuMP.jl that referenced this issue Jul 8, 2019
@coroa
Remove MOI.SingleVariable from the arguments of the @model macro
4a4b9f5 
Refer to jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl#736
coroa added a commit to coroa/JuMP.jl that referenced this issue Jul 8, 2019
@coroa
Remove MOI.SingleVariable from the arguments of the @model macro
c3ea4a9 
Refer to jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl#736
@coroa coroa mentioned this issue Jul 8, 2019
Merged
4 tasks
@Wikunia Wikunia mentioned this issue Jul 10, 2019
Merged
coroa added a commit to coroa/JuMP.jl that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2019
@coroa
Remove MOI.SingleVariable from the arguments of the @model macro
249f152 
Refer to jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl#736
@blegat blegat mentioned this issue Aug 23, 2019
Closed
This was referenced Aug 23, 2019
Closed
Closed
This was referenced Aug 23, 2019
Closed
Closed
@blegat blegat mentioned this issue Aug 25, 2019
Merged
@ccoffrin ccoffrin mentioned this issue Aug 27, 2019
Merged
@ericphanson ericphanson mentioned this issue Aug 28, 2019
Closed
@mlubin mlubin mentioned this issue Aug 29, 2019
Closed
@odow odow mentioned this issue Aug 29, 2019
Closed
@Wikunia
Copy link
Contributor

Wikunia commented Sep 3, 2019

Juniper now supports MOI 0.9 as well (since v0.5.0)

@blegat blegat mentioned this issue Sep 30, 2019
Closed
@blegat blegat mentioned this issue Oct 3, 2019
Merged
@blegat blegat mentioned this issue Oct 17, 2019
Closed
@thanosdpapaioannou
Copy link

Hi, what is the status of DSDP.jl being updated to MOI v0.9? It appears here that DSDP.jl only supports MOI version [0.8, 0.9).

@blegat
Copy link
Member Author

blegat commented Jan 6, 2020

I have a PR open: jump-dev/DSDP.jl#10

@joaquimg
Copy link
Member

joaquimg commented Mar 4, 2020

Should we close this? since the list is complete?

@joaquimg joaquimg closed this as completed Mar 4, 2020
@joaquimg joaquimg reopened this Mar 4, 2020
@odow odow closed this as completed Mar 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
7 participants
@rschwarz @blegat @mlubin @Wikunia @odow @thanosdpapaioannou @joaquimg