You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the default of 5 jars is displayed as follows:
Jar #0
Jar #1
Jar #2
Jar #3
Jar #4
While this is in accordance to JoinMarket internals, and fine for nerds and computer science people, it's probably confusing for newcomers.
Question: should we use the more natural numbering of 1 to 5?
Jar #1
Jar #2
Jar #3
Jar #4
Jar #5
I'm talking about a change in the user-facing UI only, internally numbering will start at zero, of course.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dergigi
added
question
Further information is requested
concept
Wild idea, or too many details unknown yet
UI/UX
Issue related to cosmetics, design, or user experience
labels
Jul 20, 2022
We just have to be careful to not confuse our UI indexes with the actual ones. Sweeping the forth (zero-indexed) jar when the user actually wanted to sweep the third one would be bad. 😅
Currently, the default of 5 jars is displayed as follows:
Jar #0
Jar #1
Jar #2
Jar #3
Jar #4
While this is in accordance to JoinMarket internals, and fine for nerds and computer science people, it's probably confusing for newcomers.
Question: should we use the more natural numbering of 1 to 5?
Jar #1
Jar #2
Jar #3
Jar #4
Jar #5
I'm talking about a change in the user-facing UI only, internally numbering will start at zero, of course.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: