Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: remove 'itest' test set #15276

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2024
Merged

chore: remove 'itest' test set #15276

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2024

Conversation

jjohannes
Copy link
Contributor

@jjohannes jjohannes commented Aug 30, 2024

Description:

There are only 4 test classes in this set in the whole code base. Nothing has been added since more than a year.
Since these were separate, they did not run on CI for several months.

This moves the few tests we have into the default "test" set (the tests do not take long to run).

There will be the opportunity to sort tests into more categories if needed in a next step as the current CITR effort (#14407) moves forward.

Related issue(s):

#11564

Notes for reviewer:

Checklist

  • Documented (Code comments, README, etc.)
  • Tested (unit, integration, etc.)

There are only 4 test classes in this set in the whole code base.
Nothing has been added since more than a year.
Since these were separate, they did not run on CI for several months.

This moves the few tests we have into the default "test" set (the tests
do not take long to run).

There will be the opportunity to sort tests into more categories if
needed in a next step when the current CITR effort (#14407) moves
forward.

Signed-off-by: Jendrik Johannes <[email protected]>
@jjohannes jjohannes added this to the v0.54 milestone Aug 30, 2024
@jjohannes jjohannes self-assigned this Aug 30, 2024
@jjohannes jjohannes requested review from a team as code owners August 30, 2024 06:47
@jjohannes jjohannes requested review from a team, rbarker-dev and jasperpotts August 30, 2024 06:47
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Aug 30, 2024

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.13% (target: -1.00%)
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (db414c7) 112867 68480 60.67%
Head commit (1a4a5dd) 112867 (+0) 68626 (+146) 60.80% (+0.13%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#15276) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 57.35%. Comparing base (db414c7) to head (1a4a5dd).
Report is 11 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop   #15276      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      57.23%   57.35%   +0.12%     
- Complexity     22026    22060      +34     
=============================================
  Files           2912     2912              
  Lines         113051   113051              
  Branches       11526    11526              
=============================================
+ Hits           64708    64846     +138     
+ Misses         44459    44313     -146     
- Partials        3884     3892       +8     

see 26 files with indirect coverage changes

Impacted file tree graph

Copy link
Member

@rbarker-dev rbarker-dev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@tinker-michaelj tinker-michaelj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, ty @jjohannes !

@jjohannes jjohannes merged commit 05621fa into develop Sep 2, 2024
73 of 74 checks passed
@jjohannes jjohannes deleted the 11564-remove-itest branch September 2, 2024 15:56
netopyr added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2024
* develop: (727 commits)
  chore: Bump services version to 0.55 (#15321)
  fix: Prevent designating deleted accounts as custom fee collectors (#15339)
  chore: add unit tests for `ServicesSoftwareVersion` utilities (#15326)
  chore: Remove the script forensic/start-investigation.py (#14264)
  ci: disable release 0.52 regression (#15228)
  chore: Integrate protobufs to build (#15324)
  fix: stop using raw types in `Call{Attempt,Translator}`  (#15331)
  chore: Refactor and Remove Duplicate Documentation in Services (#15286)
  feat: 15146 Added `calculateHash`, `setHash` and `getHash` methods to `State` interface (#15274)
  fix: 10342: HashListByteBuffer releases DirectByteBuffers lazily, adds memory pressure (#15296)
  fix: if the directory exist, don't create it in UnzipUtility (#15319)
  fix: use `ServicesSoftwareVersion` (#15294)
  test: add a sigRequired true additional test (#15267)
  fix: code style and javadoc fixes (#15298)
  chore: remove 'itest' test set (#15276)
  chore: rename directory 'swirlds-jasperdb' to 'swirlds-merkledb' (#15143)
  test: Token Claim Airdrop with receiverSigReq test (#15279)
  chore: 11771 Added more unit tests for `WritablePlatformStateStore` (#15268)
  chore: remove unused `hedera-evm-*` and `cli-clients` modules (#15271)
  docs: tss ledger id platform design proposal (#13747)
  ...

# Conflicts:
#	hedera-node/hedera-app/src/main/java/com/hedera/node/app/workflows/handle/cache/CacheWarmer.java
rbarker-dev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2024
stoyanov-st pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants