Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

privateca: update certificate authority samples with more realistic values #20222

Conversation

modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Some of the properties configured here are either wrong or at least not very sensible on root certificates / subordinates.
A similar set of fixes got applied to terraform documentation samples in terraform-google-modules/terraform-docs-samples#631

What is left out here is placing the subordinate CA in it's own pool. I could not figure out what is required here to prepare the test infrastructure to provision another pool dedicated to the sub-ca. Technically those two certificates should not reside in the same pool.

Derived from GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules#12259

…alues (hashicorp#12259)

Signed-off-by: Sven Hoexter <[email protected]>

[upstream:27812e087aaf4250c076b5d572b3934c1a013e2e]

Signed-off-by: Modular Magician <[email protected]>
@modular-magician modular-magician merged commit 495f491 into hashicorp:main Nov 7, 2024
4 checks passed
@modular-magician modular-magician deleted the downstream-pr-27812e087aaf4250c076b5d572b3934c1a013e2e branch November 17, 2024 00:14
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 27, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant