-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add test proxy #836
feat: add test proxy #836
Conversation
test_proxy/client_handler.py
Outdated
# look for code in subexceptions | ||
for subexc in result["subexceptions"]: | ||
if subexc.get("code", None): | ||
result["code"] = subexc["code"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will record the last exception's code. Is it intended? If so, does it correspond to the first exception occurrence (i.e., the head/root of the exception chain)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we make use of exception groups so that we can expose a set of retried errors together with the final error. The exceptions are wrapped in a bigtable.RetryException
. The final exception in the group should be the most relevant one
More details here: #825
test_proxy/client_handler.py
Outdated
true_mutations.append(Mutation._from_dict(mut_dict)) | ||
except ValueError: | ||
# invalid mutation type. Conformance test may be sending generic empty request | ||
true_mutations.append(SetCell("", "", "", -1)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it have real effect on the client? I wonder if no-op here can also work?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's been a while since I looked at this, but I think this is the one spot where I couldn't get a test to pass without modifications to the test code
I think the library will raise an exception if I try to create an empty SetCell mutation, but I believe the tests expect it. I was going to suggest we change the example mutation in the conformance tests to one with valid data
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. You are right.. But somehow they other clients seems to be fine with the empty set. You can keep the line as is. I will make the test change later and let you know when it's done.
test_proxy/client_handler.py
Outdated
project_id=None, | ||
instance_id=None, | ||
app_profile_id=None, | ||
per_operation_timeout=None, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what's the expected unit/format? The implementation seems to imply that it's integer?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
for the timeouts? They are float or None, but python accepts ints as floats
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it mean seconds or milliseconds?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's in seconds. It's better documented here:
- operation_timeout: the time budget for the entire operation, in seconds. |
Does that match the data sent from the tests?
test_proxy/client_handler_legacy.py
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How much do you want to support legacy client? I only see 3 APIs are implemented, what's the future plan (including deprecation)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We will support them side-by-side for the medium term, with plans to eventually deprecate the old client. For now, my attention has been focused on the new data client. But it would be good to get test parity at some point
test_proxy/noxfile.py
Outdated
session.run("go", "test", "-v", f"-proxy_addr=:{PROXY_SERVER_PORT}") | ||
|
||
def default(session): | ||
"""Run the performance test suite.""" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The implementation is to run the proxy?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This may have been a copy/paste error. Fixed
test_proxy/test_proxy.py
Outdated
), | ||
) | ||
proxy.start() | ||
client_handler_process(request_q, response_queue_pool, use_legacy_client) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How is it terminated? For java client testing, we use this: https://github.com/googleapis/java-bigtable/blob/main/.kokoro/conformance.sh#L59
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. It currently isn't automatically terminated, but I will need to add that for running automated tests.
I may just do this as part of the kokoro script when I add this to kokoro. Is it alright if we make that a separate PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sg.
test_proxy/client_handler.py
Outdated
project_id=None, | ||
instance_id=None, | ||
app_profile_id=None, | ||
per_operation_timeout=None, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it mean seconds or milliseconds?
test_proxy/client_handler.py
Outdated
true_mutations.append(Mutation._from_dict(mut_dict)) | ||
except ValueError: | ||
# invalid mutation type. Conformance test may be sending generic empty request | ||
true_mutations.append(SetCell("", "", "", -1)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. You are right.. But somehow they other clients seems to be fine with the empty set. You can keep the line as is. I will make the test change later and let you know when it's done.
test_proxy/test_proxy.py
Outdated
), | ||
) | ||
proxy.start() | ||
client_handler_process(request_q, response_queue_pool, use_legacy_client) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sg.
* feat: add new v3.0.0 API skeleton (#745) * feat: improve rows filters (#751) * feat: read rows query model class (#752) * feat: implement row and cell model classes (#753) * feat: add pooled grpc transport (#748) * feat: implement read_rows (#762) * feat: implement mutate rows (#769) * feat: literal value filter (#767) * feat: row_exists and read_row (#778) * feat: read_modify_write and check_and_mutate_row (#780) * feat: sharded read rows (#766) * feat: ping and warm with metadata (#810) * feat: mutate rows batching (#770) * chore: restructure module paths (#816) * feat: improve timeout structure (#819) * fix: api errors apply to all bulk mutations * chore: reduce public api surface (#820) * feat: improve error group tracebacks on < py11 (#825) * feat: optimize read_rows (#852) * chore: add user agent suffix (#842) * feat: optimize retries (#854) * feat: add test proxy (#836) * chore(tests): add conformance tests to CI for v3 (#870) * chore(tests): turn off fast fail for conformance tets (#882) * feat: add TABLE_DEFAULTS enum for table method arguments (#880) * fix: pass None for retry in gapic calls (#881) * feat: replace internal dictionaries with protos in gapic calls (#875) * chore: optimize gapic calls (#863) * feat: expose retryable error codes to users (#879) * chore: update api_core submodule (#897) * chore: merge main into experimental_v3 (#900) * chore: pin conformance tests to v0.0.2 (#903) * fix: bulk mutation eventual success (#909) --------- Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds test proxy implementation, allowing us to run language-agnostic conformance tests against the new client
Also adds support for connecting data client to an emulator
This is an update from #747
TODO: