Add Antialiasing comparison table, remove redundant MSAA limitations section #10167
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
clayjohn
reviewed
Oct 29, 2024
tetrapod00
force-pushed
the
redundant-msaa
branch
from
90972ab to
99722f2
Compare
mhilbrunner
added
enhancement
topic:rendering
area:manual
mhilbrunner
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2024
|
Looks good to me too, and if Clay approves, may as well merge :) Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #10154.
Removes a redundant section on MSAA (which, at the time of writing, apparently functioned as general antialiasing documentation). Adds a new comparison table to the
3D antialiasingpage.Information in the table is taken from the rest of the page. There's a chance that some of the information in the rest of the page will need to be updated, too.
I don't believe that a redirect or stub section on
3D rendering limitationsis needed in this case.In the table, ❌✔️ are used for renderer support, and 🔴🟡🟢 are used for comparison of features (because the⚠️ emoji is not a good match for "medium performance", for example). Table renders like this:
