Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Design for Write Data flow control #5713

Closed
Tracked by #5899
jdunkerley opened this issue Feb 21, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed
Tracked by #5899

Design for Write Data flow control #5713

jdunkerley opened this issue Feb 21, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
-libs Libraries: New libraries to be implemented l-db-write Libraries: database writer p-high Should be completed in the next sprint x-design x-new-feature Type: new feature request

Comments

@jdunkerley
Copy link
Member

jdunkerley commented Feb 21, 2023

We have runtime contexts, we need to work out what is the minimum step to make Enso viable for design partners.

We should also agree to long term vision and the path to get to that point.

@jdunkerley jdunkerley self-assigned this Feb 21, 2023
@jdunkerley jdunkerley converted this from a draft issue Feb 21, 2023
@jdunkerley jdunkerley added -libs Libraries: New libraries to be implemented l-db-write Libraries: database writer p-high Should be completed in the next sprint x-new-feature Type: new feature request x-design labels Feb 21, 2023
@jdunkerley jdunkerley added this to the Beta Release milestone Feb 21, 2023
@jdunkerley jdunkerley moved this from 📤 Backlog to ❓New in Issues Board Feb 21, 2023
@jdunkerley jdunkerley moved this from ❓New to 📤 Backlog in Issues Board Feb 21, 2023
@jdunkerley jdunkerley moved this from 📤 Backlog to 🔧 Implementation in Issues Board Feb 22, 2023
@enso-bot
Copy link

enso-bot bot commented Feb 22, 2023

James Dunkerley reports a new STANDUP for today (2023-02-22):

Progress: Estimated milestone dates with Sylwia. Recorded some videos for Greg to edit. Started on write data control flow with Ned and Sylwia. It should be finished by 2023-02-24.

Next Day: Next day I will be working on the #5713 task. Discuss plan with Jaroslav and Wojciech.

@jdunkerley jdunkerley moved this from 🔧 Implementation to 👁️ Code review in Issues Board Feb 23, 2023
@enso-bot
Copy link

enso-bot bot commented Feb 24, 2023

James Dunkerley reports a new STANDUP for yesterday (2023-02-23):

Progress: Reviewed and updated the design for execution contexts with Jaroslav and Wojciech. Updated the design to reflect discussions. Worked on #5651 and isolated and fixed a few low level issues. It should be finished by 2023-02-24.

Next Day: Next day I will be working on the #5651 task. Solve the JSON serialisation issue.

@jdunkerley jdunkerley moved this from 👁️ Code review to 🌟 Q/A review in Issues Board Feb 27, 2023
@jdunkerley jdunkerley moved this from 🌟 Q/A review to 🔴 Changes requested in Issues Board Mar 10, 2023
@jdunkerley jdunkerley moved this from 🔴 Changes requested to 👁️ Code review in Issues Board Mar 13, 2023
This was referenced Mar 14, 2023
@jdunkerley jdunkerley moved this from 👁️ Code review to 🔴 Changes requested in Issues Board Mar 21, 2023
@jdunkerley jdunkerley moved this from 🔴 Changes requested to 👁️ Code review in Issues Board Mar 24, 2023
@jdunkerley jdunkerley assigned wdanilo and unassigned jdunkerley Mar 24, 2023
@wdanilo
Copy link
Member

wdanilo commented Mar 25, 2023

It's accepted and it seems we are on the same page, thus closing this issue :)

@wdanilo wdanilo closed this as completed Mar 25, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 👁️ Code review to 🟢 Accepted in Issues Board Mar 25, 2023
@farmaazon farmaazon moved this from 🟢 Accepted to 🗄️ Archived in Issues Board Apr 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-libs Libraries: New libraries to be implemented l-db-write Libraries: database writer p-high Should be completed in the next sprint x-design x-new-feature Type: new feature request
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants