Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Research #7

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 31, 2017
Merged

Research #7

merged 5 commits into from
Mar 31, 2017

Conversation

jackcarlisle
Copy link
Member

@jackcarlisle jackcarlisle commented Mar 31, 2017

ready for review

  • first draft research on existing platforms, open source examples and requirements

#1

@jackcarlisle jackcarlisle changed the title Research [WiP] Research Mar 31, 2017
@jackcarlisle jackcarlisle changed the title [WiP] Research Research Mar 31, 2017
README.md Outdated
a good interface for the feedback itself but it's too specific which means that
it doesn't apply to organisations such as dwyl. The feedback is public and
comments can be made on the feedback:
![sayat.me feedback](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/12450298/24554452/38df2670-15f3-11e7-9cdd-8757072183e0.png)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jackcarlisle thanks for uploading these images to an issue to save on storing them in the repo. 👍
However it has highlighted that including lots of screenshots in the main readme means the page will take an inordinately long time to load on a "slower" internet connection ...
feedback-page-load-time-over-3g-36sec
On a "Regular 3G connection" the readme will take 38 seconds to load ... ⏳

Should we consider creating a research.md file for this content so that it's not loaded for the main readme?

P.S. I know I'm the worst for including images in readmes, so I'm going to change that for all tutorials I contribute to from now on. 👍

README.md Outdated
toggles on the feedback it would mean that you could attach your name to it, or
not, and you could also say whether or not you would prefer if the feedback was
kept private or made public. He said that it might be good to have an incentive
to give feedback as well so that more people would get involved.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Conorc1000 good features. please add them to the backlog. 👍

@nelsonic
Copy link
Member

I agree 100% that privacy and anonymity are two core features of this "system". ✅
There is a branch of "forensic linguistics" that aims to identify people from their writing.
see: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2011/08/identifying_peo_2.html

We will encourage people to write in simple terms and short sentences so their writing style/pattern cannot be inferred by some "ML Algo". 👍

Copy link
Member

@nelsonic nelsonic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jackcarlisle this is a great start. we should encourage other people to add to the research.md file. 👍

@nelsonic nelsonic merged commit 37d3c71 into master Mar 31, 2017
@nelsonic nelsonic deleted the research branch March 31, 2017 22:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants