Feature 2441 main_v11.0 comp

[jprestop]

Expected Differences

• Do these changes introduce new tools, command line arguments, or configuration file options? [No]
  
  If yes, please describe:
  

• Do these changes modify the structure of existing or add new output data types (e.g. statistic line types or NetCDF variables)? [No]
  
  If yes, please describe:
  

Pull Request Testing

• Describe testing already performed for these changes:
  
  Installed with the compilation script and install_met_env.acorn_py3.10 on WCOSS2 Acorn.

• Recommend testing for the reviewer(s) to perform, including the location of input datasets, and any additional instructions:
  
  Review files if desired; Ensure all tests pass

• Do these changes include sufficient documentation updates, ensuring that no errors or warnings exist in the build of the documentation? [N/A]

• Do these changes include sufficient testing updates? [No]

• Will this PR result in changes to the test suite? [No]
  
  If yes, describe the new output and/or changes to the existing output:
  

• Please complete this pull request review by [ASAP but by the morning of 20230221 at the latest].
  

Pull Request Checklist

See the METplus Workflow for details.

• Review the source issue metadata (required labels, projects, and milestone). (They are)
• Complete the PR definition above.
• Ensure the PR title matches the feature or bugfix branch name.
• Define the PR metadata, as permissions allow.
  Select: Reviewer(s)
  Select: Organization level software support Project or Repository level development cycle Project
  Select: Milestone as the version that will include these changes
• After submitting the PR, select Development issue with the original issue number.
• After the PR is approved, merge your changes. If permissions do not allow this, request that the reviewer do the merge.
• Close the linked issue and delete your feature or bugfix branch from GitHub.

[j-opatz]

Looks like the only automated testing that failed for this PR was missing climo data files.

Other than those, this PR seems to be in line with the expected outcome and is approved.

[jprestop]

Thank you, @j-opatz. This was concerning and not expected:

Looks like the only automated testing that failed for this PR was missing climo data files.

So, last night after I got your message, I reran the failed test, and it looks like it is passing now, so we're in good shape. I'll go ahead and squash and merge now. Thanks so much for the review and for pointing out that a test failed in your message.