Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[FEATURE]: CSM Replication Support For PowerScale #116

Closed
walker2 opened this issue Dec 1, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

[FEATURE]: CSM Replication Support For PowerScale #116

walker2 opened this issue Dec 1, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
@walker2 @maxan98
Labels
area/csm-replication Issue pertains to the CSM Replication module type/feature A feature. This label is applied to a feature issues.
Milestone
v1.2.0

Comments

@walker2
Copy link

walker2 commented Dec 1, 2021 •
edited by gallacher
Loading

Ensure that functionality offered with PowerMax and PowerStore replication is inherited into PowerScale.

Acceptance criteria:

  1. Customer is able to replicate PowerScale PVs/PVCs to another PowerScale array in real-time
  2. Customer is able to restore the volumes back to the original array or PowerScale cluster and resume regular operations

Additionally, sidecar versions should be bumped up to version 1.2.0 in csi-powermax, csi-powerscale and csi-powerstore
@gallacher gallacher changed the title [FEATURE]: CSM Replication Implementation For PowerScale [FEATURE]: CSM Replication Support For PowerScale Dec 8, 2021
This was referenced Jan 25, 2022
Closed
Closed
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Feb 14, 2022
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Feb 22, 2022
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Mar 17, 2022
Merged
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@walker2 walker2

@maxan98 maxan98

Labels
area/csm-replication Issue pertains to the CSM Replication module type/feature A feature. This label is applied to a feature issues.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.2.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@walker2 @maxan98