Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

System tests: corner case for run --pull #7828

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2020

Conversation

edsantiago
Copy link
Member

Obscure corner case in which 'podman run --pull=never alpine'
will actually pass with no alpine image if there's an
image named "myalpine". (i.e. a substring match, not full
string match). Fixed in #7770 but the tests that were added
there do not actually test that.

This adds a double-duty test for that as well as making
sure that 'run --pull=never SHORTNAME' (implicit :latest)
does not match our existing :YYYYMMDD image; then one
more quick test to make sure that if we tag as :latest,
the same --pull=never succeeds.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago [email protected]

Obscure corner case in which 'podman run --pull=never alpine'
will actually pass *with no alpine image* if there's an
image named "myalpine". (i.e. a substring match, not full
string match). Fixed in containers#7770 but the tests that were added
there do not actually test that.

This adds a double-duty test for that as well as making
sure that 'run --pull=never SHORTNAME' (implicit :latest)
does not match our existing :YYYYMMDD image; then one
more quick test to make sure that if we tag as :latest,
the same --pull=never succeeds.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 29, 2020
@edsantiago
Copy link
Member Author

Oh, forgot to mention: this new test (correctly) fails in pre-7770 podman.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 29, 2020

LGTM
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: edsantiago, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 29, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 29, 2020
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 29, 2020

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 29, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 453333a into containers:master Sep 29, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants