-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[v4.0] Option --url and --connection should imply --remote #13395
[v4.0] Option --url and --connection should imply --remote #13395
Conversation
Addresses containers#13393 and replaces containers#13357. Many thanks to @Romain-Geissler-1A for the initial submission and discussions. Signed-off-by: tomsweeneyredhat <[email protected]>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: TomSweeneyRedHat The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/hold
@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL
Restarted the flaked job.
This was reverted in #13392 |
Reopening. This should NOT be merged until we are preparing for RHEL8.6.1 and RHEL 9.0.1 or later deliveries. In addition, a cherry-pick for this to the v4.0-rhel branch will probably be needed. |
A friendly reminder that this PR had no activity for 30 days. |
Is this still needed or should we close and wait for podman 4.1? |
With @mheon 's blessing, we could merge this into the v4.0 branch at any time. As RHEL 8.6.0.2 will have Podman v4.1 in it, and the fix is in upstream, we could then close the associated issue. |
Addresses #13393 and replaces #13357. Many thanks to
@Romain-Geissler-1A for the initial submission and discussions.
Signed-off-by: tomsweeneyredhat [email protected]